2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2009.5178943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feed-forward Artificial Neural Network based inference system applied in bioinformatics data-mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several FANN configurations were tested and evaluated (Leiva et al, 2009) with three different input data models: without previous BLAST parameter normalisation, with a normalisation approach previously discussed in literature (Arredondo et al, 2008), and with a new parameter normalisation approach. Several FANN configurations were tested and evaluated (Leiva et al, 2009) with three different input data models: without previous BLAST parameter normalisation, with a normalisation approach previously discussed in literature (Arredondo et al, 2008), and with a new parameter normalisation approach.…”
Section: Neural Network Based Inference Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several FANN configurations were tested and evaluated (Leiva et al, 2009) with three different input data models: without previous BLAST parameter normalisation, with a normalisation approach previously discussed in literature (Arredondo et al, 2008), and with a new parameter normalisation approach. Several FANN configurations were tested and evaluated (Leiva et al, 2009) with three different input data models: without previous BLAST parameter normalisation, with a normalisation approach previously discussed in literature (Arredondo et al, 2008), and with a new parameter normalisation approach.…”
Section: Neural Network Based Inference Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inference systems were evaluated and catalogued according to the following test cases: two sets of fuzzy rules generated by human naive and expert users (H-N and H-E), a standard SVM classifier implementation (Weka SMO Waikato environment for knowledge analysis, http://sourceforge.net/projects/weka/), two sets of fuzzy rules (GA-1 and GA-2) that were generated by a GA training method (Arredondo et al, 2008) and five FANN-based inference systems (i.e., NN-1 through NN-5) (Leiva et al, 2009). The other 50% were used as the test set to evaluate the obtained models and associated inference systems.…”
Section: First Experiment: Inference System Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%