2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.00802
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Federated Learning under Channel Uncertainty: Joint Client Scheduling and Resource Allocation

Abstract: In this work, we propose a novel joint client scheduling and resource block (RB) allocation policy to minimize the loss of accuracy in federated learning (FL) over wireless compared to a centralized training-based solution, under imperfect channel state information (CSI). First, the problem is cast as a stochastic optimization problem over a predefined training duration and solved using the Lyapunov optimization framework. In order to learn and track the wireless channel, a Gaussian process regression (GPR)-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimization of learning time was studied in [8], [27]- [33], and joint optimization for learning time and energy consumption was considered in [34]- [37]. These works considered resource (e.g., transmission power, communication bandwidth, and CPU frequency) allocation (e.g., [27], [28], [34]- [37]), cost-aware client selection (e.g., [29], [30]), client scheduling (e.g., [31]- [33]), and model pruning [8] for prespecified (i.e., non-optimized) design parameters (K and E in our case) of the FL algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization of learning time was studied in [8], [27]- [33], and joint optimization for learning time and energy consumption was considered in [34]- [37]. These works considered resource (e.g., transmission power, communication bandwidth, and CPU frequency) allocation (e.g., [27], [28], [34]- [37]), cost-aware client selection (e.g., [29], [30]), client scheduling (e.g., [31]- [33]), and model pruning [8] for prespecified (i.e., non-optimized) design parameters (K and E in our case) of the FL algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, a joint user selection and resource allocation policy towards minimizing the FEEL loss function was proposed in [20] by taking into account the packet error over wireless links. In addition, [21] presented an effective client scheduling and resource allocation policy for FEEL over wireless links with imperfect channel state information (CSI). Besides, the trade-off between learning time and energy consumption in FEEL was investigated in [22] and [23], where [22] developed a closed-form communication and computation resource allocation in a synchronous manner, and [23] designed an iterative algorithm for joint power control and resource allocation.…”
Section: A Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although FL is a very efficient way of designing an ML framework for wireless communication, it is mostly considered for the applications of wireless sensor networks, e.g., UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) networks [7], [8], vehicular networks [9]. In [7], the authors applies FL to the trajectory planning problem where a UAV swarm is employed and the data collected by each UAV are processed for gradient computation and a global NN at the "leading" UAV is trained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], the authors applies FL to the trajectory planning problem where a UAV swarm is employed and the data collected by each UAV are processed for gradient computation and a global NN at the "leading" UAV is trained. In [8] and [9], client scheduling and power allocation problems are investigated for FL framework respectively. Different from [7]- [9], [10] considers a more realistic scenario where the gradients are transmitted to the BS through a noisy wireless channel and a classification model is trained for image classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%