Federal Conflict of Interest Law

Manning, Bayless

doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674421875

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Other1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1996

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By the 1950s conflict of interest was however a generally accepted legal term in the USA. Two standard works on the subject were also published around this time (Association of the Bar of the City of New York 1960, Manning 1964).…”

Section: The Concept Of Conflict Of Interest In Legal Thought and In mentioning

confidence: 99%

Capitalism and ethics: how conflicts‐of‐interest legislation can be used to handle moral dilemmas in the economy^*

Swedberg

2005

Int Social Sci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: The Concept Of Conflict Of Interest In Legal Thought and In mentioning

confidence: 99%

Capitalism and ethics: how conflicts‐of‐interest legislation can be used to handle moral dilemmas in the economy^*

Swedberg

2005

Int Social Sci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Conflicts of Interest and commitment in academic science in the United States

Etzkowitz¹

1996

Minerva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Politicized Enforcement of Laws Criminalizing Executive Branch Conflicts of Interest

Peterson¹

2022

Pres Stud Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There exist a host of separate federal statutes governing conflicts of interest for employees in the federal executive branch. These are supplemented by additional administrative rules promulgated by the Office of Government Ethics. Most provisions regulate financial self-dealing via the imposition of criminal sanctions. In this article, I analyze the enforcement of public ethics law in the executive branch in three ways: first, by examining the textual substance of the statutory and administrative provisions regulating financial conflicts; second, through the presentation of descriptive statistics on enforcement of federal prohibitions on self-dealing; and third, through exploratory analyses to investigate whether enforcement of federal public ethics law is driven by partisan dynamics or ideological preferences. My results indicate that the Department of Justice is at least somewhat more likely to successfully prosecute employees of agencies whose ideological preferences are misaligned with the incumbent president.

show abstract

Federal Conflict of Interest Law

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Capitalism and ethics: how conflicts‐of‐interest legislation can be used to handle moral dilemmas in the economy^*

Capitalism and ethics: how conflicts‐of‐interest legislation can be used to handle moral dilemmas in the economy^*

Conflicts of Interest and commitment in academic science in the United States

The Politicized Enforcement of Laws Criminalizing Executive Branch Conflicts of Interest

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Federal Conflict of Interest Law

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Capitalism and ethics: how conflicts‐of‐interest legislation can be used to handle moral dilemmas in the economy*

Capitalism and ethics: how conflicts‐of‐interest legislation can be used to handle moral dilemmas in the economy*

Conflicts of Interest and commitment in academic science in the United States

The Politicized Enforcement of Laws Criminalizing Executive Branch Conflicts of Interest

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Capitalism and ethics: how conflicts‐of‐interest legislation can be used to handle moral dilemmas in the economy^*

Capitalism and ethics: how conflicts‐of‐interest legislation can be used to handle moral dilemmas in the economy^*