2014 IEEE 38th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/compsac.2014.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FECAR: A Feature Selection Framework for Software Defect Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FST could identify and extract most useful features of the dataset for learning, and these features are very valuable for analysis and future prediction. In most cases, the classification accuracy using the reduced feature set equaled to or bettered than that of using the complete feature set [1,8,15,25,31]. Nevertheless, as stated by Hall [15] in some cases, FS degraded ML performance in cases where some features are eliminated which are highly predictive of very small areas of the instance space or some features which are not predictive are selected.…”
Section: Feature Selection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FST could identify and extract most useful features of the dataset for learning, and these features are very valuable for analysis and future prediction. In most cases, the classification accuracy using the reduced feature set equaled to or bettered than that of using the complete feature set [1,8,15,25,31]. Nevertheless, as stated by Hall [15] in some cases, FS degraded ML performance in cases where some features are eliminated which are highly predictive of very small areas of the instance space or some features which are not predictive are selected.…”
Section: Feature Selection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Fundamentals to employ ML for effective and improved SFP are consideration of different software metrics [4] - [7], [11] - [14], [29,30], Feature Selection (FS) [1,8,9], [15] - [17], [25], [28,34] and Data Balancing (DB) [9,18], [35] - [38]. For SFP, many software metrics have been proposed but we favor to separate the studies according to the most frequently used metrics: Chidamber and Kemerer's (CK) Object Oriented Metrics (OOM) and McCabe and Halstead Static Code Metrics (SCM) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [22] proposed a two-stage data preprocessing framework, TC, which combines feature selection and instance reduction. Liu et al [23] proposed a new feature selection framework, FECAR, to conduct feature clustering and feature ranking.…”
Section: B Feature Selection In Defect Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our method with six classical feature selection methods in defect prediction:(1)Full, (2)Chi-Square [28], (3) Signal-to-Noise [29], (4)Information Gain [30], (5)Gain Ratio [31], and (6)FSCAR [23].…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation