2014
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal starch as an indicator of total-tract starch digestibility by lactating dairy cows

Abstract: To test whether total-tract starch digestibility by lactating dairy cattle could be predicted accurately from concentration of starch in fecal dry matter (FS), data from 8 digestibility trials, 30 diets, and 564 individual starch measurements were compiled from trials conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Total-tract starch digestibility by individual cows was determined from the concentrations of starch in total mixed rations and feces (rectal grab samples) and concentrations of several external o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
37
4
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
11
37
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been well established in lactating dairy cows that a decrease in fecal starch is associated with increased feed efficiency and milk production (Firkins et al, 2001); however, fecal starch has not been used for or validated as a marker of weaning success in calves. In the current experiment, fecal starch percentages were lower in the preweaning phase (d 35 of life) compared with that reported in lactating dairy cows (Fredin et al, 2014). The 6WW calves displayed the highest and most variable fecal starch levels, exceeding that of 8WW calves 1 wk after weaning.…”
contrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been well established in lactating dairy cows that a decrease in fecal starch is associated with increased feed efficiency and milk production (Firkins et al, 2001); however, fecal starch has not been used for or validated as a marker of weaning success in calves. In the current experiment, fecal starch percentages were lower in the preweaning phase (d 35 of life) compared with that reported in lactating dairy cows (Fredin et al, 2014). The 6WW calves displayed the highest and most variable fecal starch levels, exceeding that of 8WW calves 1 wk after weaning.…”
contrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In addition to ruminal metrics, the total digestive tract starch digestibility was assessed by fecal starch quantification (Fredin et al, 2014). It has been well established in lactating dairy cows that a decrease in fecal starch is associated with increased feed efficiency and milk production (Firkins et al, 2001); however, fecal starch has not been used for or validated as a marker of weaning success in calves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment TMR, fecal, and ort samples were composited by week (TMR samples), pen within week (ort samples), or cow within pen within week (fecal samples); the composited samples were analyzed for DM, OM, CP, NDF, starch, and lignin, as previously described. Total-tract starch digestibility was also calculated from fecal starch concentration using the equation [100 × (0.9997 − 0.0125 × fecal starch, % DM)] (Fredin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ttSTD was greater (P < 0.01) for SHRD than KP. Similarly, ttSTD calculated using the fecal starch concentration equation of Fredin et al (2014) was greater (P < 0.05) for SHRD than KP. Treatment means for ttSTD calculated using fecal starch were 98.5, 98.9, and 99.0% for KP, KPH, and SHRD, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The science that studies feces, called Scatology, has been done since 1920's (Seton, 1925) by exploring several types of information obtained from feces and their contents, such as for identifying the animal (Camardella et al, 2000), diet composition (Santos andHartz 1999, Kauhala andAuniola 2001), seasonal diet changes (Aragona and Setz 2001), health condition, and potential enteroparasitosis dynamics (Patton et al 1986, Page et al, 2001. Moreover, recently, feces could be used to determine starch digestion (Fredin et al, 2014;Zinn et al, 2007) as well as organic matter digestion (Lukas et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%