2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11247101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal Sludge Derived Products as Fertilizer for Lettuce Cultivation in Urban Agriculture

Abstract: Fecal sludge (FS) contains a significant amount of plant nutrients. FS (treated/untreated) has been used as soil ameliorant in several countries. Use of FS-based compost on lettuce may meet reservations due to possible microbiological contamination. The objectives of this research are: (1) To determine the fertilizer value of different formulations of sawdust and fecal sludge compost (SDFS) pellets, and (2) to compare the effect of these SDFS formulations with poultry manure, commercial compost, mineral fertil… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e soil at the study site was treated with the sewage sludge. e treatments depended on application rates of the sludge based on recommended nitrogen levels: 160 kg N/ha, 210 kg N/ha, 260 kg N/ha, and 0 kg N/ha (control) for cabbage and 100 kg N/ha, 150 kg N/ ha, 200 kg N/ha, and 0 kg N/ha (control) for lettuce [12][13][14]. e corresponding amounts of sludge (mg) for each of the treatments for the two plants (Table 1) were estimated using equation ( 1) developed by Cooperative Extension Service, University of Purdue, Indiana (https://www.extension.…”
Section: Study Site and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e soil at the study site was treated with the sewage sludge. e treatments depended on application rates of the sludge based on recommended nitrogen levels: 160 kg N/ha, 210 kg N/ha, 260 kg N/ha, and 0 kg N/ha (control) for cabbage and 100 kg N/ha, 150 kg N/ ha, 200 kg N/ha, and 0 kg N/ha (control) for lettuce [12][13][14]. e corresponding amounts of sludge (mg) for each of the treatments for the two plants (Table 1) were estimated using equation ( 1) developed by Cooperative Extension Service, University of Purdue, Indiana (https://www.extension.…”
Section: Study Site and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fecal sludge application may increase soil fertility, especially regarding carbon retention, but retention of bioavailable phosphorus and nitrogen can be low [46]. Furthermore, untreated fecal sludge poses risks to the crops because of pathogens, heavy metals, and toxic levels of ammonia and nitrite; additionally, the intensive fermentation activities within untreated fecal sludge can result in hypoxia in the rhizosphere [47,48]. To avoid these risks, treatment of fecal sludge or wastewater is required before its agricultural reuse.…”
Section: Viral Pathogens and Protozoan Parasites May Have Relatively Lower Infectious Doses Thanmentioning
confidence: 99%