2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/434801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal Occult Blood Test and Gastrointestinal Parasitic Infection

Abstract: Stool specimens of 1238 workers in western region of Saudi Arabia were examined for infection with intestinal parasites and for fecal occult blood (FOB) to investigate the possibility that enteroparasites correlate to occult intestinal bleeding. Direct smears and formal ether techniques were used for detection of diagnostic stages of intestinal parasites. A commercially available guaiac test was used to detect fecal occult blood. 47.01% of the workers were infected with intestinal parasites including eight hel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of this study indicated similar previous observations that there was no significant association between intestinal parasitic infection and positive FOB, but were inconsistent with another investigation [28][29][30].…”
contrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Results of this study indicated similar previous observations that there was no significant association between intestinal parasitic infection and positive FOB, but were inconsistent with another investigation [28][29][30].…”
contrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The present study demonstrated that positive test occult blood test during routine analysis was correlated with the intestinal parasitic infection. However, as test occult blood test is widely used in Nepal, more awareness for the public about importance of restricting some foods and drugs intake prior fecal occult blood test is needed and our result with occult blood test is consistent with the Wakid et al, 11. In this study, the overall prevalence of intestinal parasites among village school children was 31.13%, which is consistent with the findings of Wadood et al, and Tadesse 10.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The prevalence was 13.3% in India [ 20 ], 32.0 – 41.5% in Palestine [ 21 ], 8.8% in Iran [ 22 ], 57.9% in Iraq [ 23 ], 10.2% in Qatar [ 24 ], 64.4% in Sudan [ 25 ], 7.7% in UAE [ 26 ], and 58.7% in Yemen [ 27 ]. However in KSA, the prevalence rate was 27.2% in Al-Ahsa [ 28 ], 47.01% in Jeddah [ 29 ], 6.2% in Makkah [ 30 ], 8.4% in Tabuk [ 31 ], and 2.3 – 39.7% in Riyadh [ 15 , 32 – 34 ]. The much lower prevalence of infection during this study, compared to the previous studies particularly in Riyadh region, could be explained in one hand to the fact that most of the examined patients were Saudi citizens and most of them urban dwellers with a high socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%