2023
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1136343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal microbiota transplantation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: ObjectiveWhether fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is effective in improving outcomes remains controversial. We assessed the safety and efficacy of FMT for patients with IBS.MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the clinicaltrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) up to February 25, 2022, updated to March 28, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we speculate that higher levels of fecal organic acids in NC-IBS patients may indicate a greater likelihood of success for therapeutic interventions targeting the microbiome. In addition to the low-FODMAP diet, which has significant limitations in long-term sustainability, this subset of IBS patients may represent the population most likely to derive substantial benefits from treatments such as antibiotics (e.g., as rifaximin), interventions involving probiotics or live biotherapeutics (e.g., Blautia hydrogenotrophica , 50 , and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), the efficacy of which in IBS is controversial 51 . Concerning FMT, we can postulate that in IBS patients where the colonic microbial ecosystem is a major contributor to symptoms (as we hypothesized here, particularly in FC-H patients), FMT may offer the most significant and potentially enduring advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we speculate that higher levels of fecal organic acids in NC-IBS patients may indicate a greater likelihood of success for therapeutic interventions targeting the microbiome. In addition to the low-FODMAP diet, which has significant limitations in long-term sustainability, this subset of IBS patients may represent the population most likely to derive substantial benefits from treatments such as antibiotics (e.g., as rifaximin), interventions involving probiotics or live biotherapeutics (e.g., Blautia hydrogenotrophica , 50 , and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), the efficacy of which in IBS is controversial 51 . Concerning FMT, we can postulate that in IBS patients where the colonic microbial ecosystem is a major contributor to symptoms (as we hypothesized here, particularly in FC-H patients), FMT may offer the most significant and potentially enduring advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes . The primary outcome measures of this review will be the efficiency rate and the Symptoms Severity Score [ 30 ]. The clinical efficiency rate was defined as the degree of relief of IBS symptoms, which are assessed through the Symptoms Severity Score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each modality can improve the composition of the gut microbiota effectively and has been widely used in digestive diseases other than cancer. 82,83 Endoscopic transplantation is the most direct way to accurately transplant larger amounts of intestinal bacteria into the implicated bowel segment with potentially greater clinical efficacy, especially in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), 84,85 IBS, 85 and IBD. 86,87 However, endoscopic operations are more invasive and intolerable.…”
Section: Fecal Microbiota Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%