Fecal DNA metabarcoding shows credible short-term prey detections and explains variation in the gut microbiome of two polar bear subpopulations

Abstract

This study developed and evaluated DNA metabarcoding to identify the presence of pinniped and cetacean prey DNA in fecal samples of East Greenland (EG) and Southern Beaufort Sea (SB) polar bears Ursus maritimus sampled in the spring of 2015-2019. Prey DNA was detected in half (49/92) of all samples, and when detected, ringed seal Pusa hispida was the predominant prey species, identified in 100% (22/22) of EG and 81% (22/27) of SB polar bear samples with prey DNA detected. Bearded seal Erignathus barbatus DNA was found in 19% (5/27) of SB polar bear samples for which prey DNA was detected. Prey DNA detection frequencies and relative abundances were compared to estimates from quantitative fatty acid signature analysis (QFASA) for a subset of SB polar bears. Ringed seal and bearded seal were the main prey identified by both methods, but QFASA also identified 2 cetacean prey species not found by prey DNA. Differences in DNA metabarcoding vs. QFASA results were likely related to the different dietary timescales captured by each approach, i.e. short-term vs. long-term diet, respectively. Prey DNA detection, sex/age class, and subpopulation significantly explained variation in polar bear gut bacterial composition. Polar bear samples with prey DNA detected were associated with higher abundances of the bacterial classes Clostridia and Bacilli and lower abundances of Negativicutes. Fecal DNA metabarcoding is thus useful for identifying recent prey of polar bears, complementing quantitative and likely longer-term QFASA estimates, and may help understand variation in the polar bear gut microbiome.

DNA metabarcoding diet analysis in ruminants is quantitative and integrates feeding over several weeks

“…But our findings raise the question about the interpretation with DNA methods of the temporal dynamics of herbivorous diets. In general, dietary DNA started to appear in faeces in less than 24 hours post-feeding, independently of the primer set, thus corroborating the idea that DNA metabarcoding detects very recent feeding events (Deagle et al 2005; Franz et al 2023). Yet, our data also show that trace amounts of birch DNA were detectable over the duration of our experiment (i.e.…”

Intraguild processes drive space‐use patterns in a large‐bodied marine predator community

“…The incorporation of innovative, minimally invasive and efficient dietary assessment methods (e.g. DNA metabarcoding from cloacal swabs; van Zinnicq Bergmann et al., 2021) alongside conventional methods (Franz et al., 2023; Snider et al., 2022), prey surveys (Lester et al., 2021) and/or biologging of individual behaviour (e.g. Papastamatiou et al., 2018; Watanabe & Papastamatiou, 2023) could provide a more detailed understanding of the underlying mechanisms behind space‐use patterns in marine predator communities.…”