1991
DOI: 10.1159/000110259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Febrile Seizures

Abstract: A door-to-door survey was carried out to screen a community of 14,010 people (Parsis living in colonies in Bombay, India) for possible neurological diseases. High school graduates, social workers, and a medical student administered a screening questionnaire that, in a pilot study, had a high sensitivity for identifying febrile seizures in children under the age of 14 years. Neurologists used defined diagnostic criteria to evaluate individuals positive on the screening survey. There were 1,581 children under th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to understand the limitations of the perturbative QCD approach here, because the pion distribution amplitude inferred from F π (Q 2 ) is used in other calculations. They appear, for example, in light-cone sum rule calculations of the form factor at low q 2 for the exclusive weak decay B → π ν to determine V ub [52,53]. Figure 2 shows a curve (labelled PQCD 2) that uses a shape for the distribution amplitude φ ηs = (x(1 − x)) ζ at a scale Q/2 = 2GeV where x is the light-cone momentum fraction and ζ = 0.52(6) is chosen to agree with lattice QCD results for a 2 for the π [50] (results indicate only weak quark mass-dependence, so this should be a good approximation).…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to understand the limitations of the perturbative QCD approach here, because the pion distribution amplitude inferred from F π (Q 2 ) is used in other calculations. They appear, for example, in light-cone sum rule calculations of the form factor at low q 2 for the exclusive weak decay B → π ν to determine V ub [52,53]. Figure 2 shows a curve (labelled PQCD 2) that uses a shape for the distribution amplitude φ ηs = (x(1 − x)) ζ at a scale Q/2 = 2GeV where x is the light-cone momentum fraction and ζ = 0.52(6) is chosen to agree with lattice QCD results for a 2 for the π [50] (results indicate only weak quark mass-dependence, so this should be a good approximation).…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [74,75,76] and references within). The |V ub | estimate are generally higher than the corresponding lattice ones, but still in agreement, within the relatively larger theoretical errors.…”
Section: Exclusive Decaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12], the B − S form-factors are calculated with the LCSR in the leading order approximation, the perturbative O(α s ) corrections are neglected. Due to the lengthy calculations, only perturbative O(α s ) corrections to the twist-2 and twist-3 terms in the LCSR for the B − P, V form-factors [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and perturbative O(α 2 s ) corrections to the twist-2 terms in the LCSR for the B − π form-factor [27] are studied up to now, where the P and V denote the light pseudoscalar and vector mesons, respectively. In this article, we study the B − S form-factors by taking into account the perturbative O(α s ) corrections to the twist-2 terms using the LCSR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%