2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features of the acceptor band and properties of localized carriers from studies of the variable-range hopping conduction in single crystals of p-Cu2ZnSnS4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the VRH charge transfer is expectable when the Fermi level, , lies close to one of the edges of the impurity band (or the acceptor band (AB) in our case of the p-type semiconductor) [25]. This takes place for the cases of a weak (K << 1) or strong (1  K << 1) degree of the compensation, K, as it has been established in [26] and [30], respectively. Following the arguments in [26] and [30], we can assume one of the two cases, considering the proximity to the MIT given by the relatively small difference of |  E c |, where +E c and  E c are the mobility edges [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the VRH charge transfer is expectable when the Fermi level, , lies close to one of the edges of the impurity band (or the acceptor band (AB) in our case of the p-type semiconductor) [25]. This takes place for the cases of a weak (K << 1) or strong (1  K << 1) degree of the compensation, K, as it has been established in [26] and [30], respectively. Following the arguments in [26] and [30], we can assume one of the two cases, considering the proximity to the MIT given by the relatively small difference of |  E c |, where +E c and  E c are the mobility edges [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This takes place for the cases of a weak (K << 1) or strong (1  K << 1) degree of the compensation, K, as it has been established in [26] and [30], respectively. Following the arguments in [26] and [30], we can assume one of the two cases, considering the proximity to the MIT given by the relatively small difference of |  E c |, where +E c and  E c are the mobility edges [20]. Because the impurity states are extended within the ( E c , +E c ) interval around the center of an impurity band and are localized outside this interval, the position of  close to one of the AB edges or tails is consistent with the VRH conduction regime [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations