2000
DOI: 10.1177/0730888400027003004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features of Service Relationships and Encounters

Abstract: This article explores the experiences of customers who receive service in relationships (customers who return to the same provider for service), pseudorelationships (the same organization but a different provider), and encounters (neither a regular provider nor a regular firm). We examined interactions with hairstylists, auto mechanics, and physicians to test hypotheses about customers' reactions to service delivery. Although customers respond particularly well to service relationships, based on our results fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marketing studies indicate that service agents may develop personal relationships with customers that involve trust and authenticity, often leading to feelings of closeness, affection, and intimacy (Crosby et al, 1990;Gutek, Cherry, Bhappu, Schneider, & Woolf, 2000). To the extent that service agents develop 'a perception of oneness' (Ashforth & Mael, 1989, p. 20)-of being 'psychologically intertwined' (p. 21)-with their customers, they can be said to identify with their customers.…”
Section: Customer Identificationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Marketing studies indicate that service agents may develop personal relationships with customers that involve trust and authenticity, often leading to feelings of closeness, affection, and intimacy (Crosby et al, 1990;Gutek, Cherry, Bhappu, Schneider, & Woolf, 2000). To the extent that service agents develop 'a perception of oneness' (Ashforth & Mael, 1989, p. 20)-of being 'psychologically intertwined' (p. 21)-with their customers, they can be said to identify with their customers.…”
Section: Customer Identificationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The fifth control, customer type, refers to whether the customers with whom agents interacted were known to them in advance (i.e., 'repeat' customers) or were unknown and randomly assigned. Following Gutek et al (2000), it seems reasonable that service agents would be more likely to identify and enact more positive customer-oriented service behaviors with customers with whom they are familiar. The sixth control, position type, refers to whether an agent handles inbound calls (sales, service, or technical support), outbound calls (sales), or 'other' (administrative support, including email response and warranty operations).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the field of forensics, the general public has become an indirect benefactor-addressed in hopeful statements that knowledge about the true cause and manner of death will benefit the grieving processand the relationship is often a one-time encounter (Gutek, Cherry, Bhappy, Schneider, & Woolf, 2000). Most of the direct audience of forensic findings relates to other government officials and bureaucrats who use death certificates to launch additional investigations (Reed, 1996).…”
Section: The Market Shelter: a Perch Or A Bunker?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This empirical study is limited to the context of a high-touch, encounter-based industry (Gutek et al, 2000;Gutek et al, 2002), which holds special interest for service recovery research. It also would be interesting to study unfavourable service experiences and service recoveries in the field in which human interaction plays an important role in service co-creation.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%