2022
DOI: 10.52821/2789-4401-2022-2-104-115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features of regional development projects problems: analysis based on central Kazakhstan monotowns

Abstract: The purpose of the paper examines the problem of regional development projects (RDP) in monotowns of Kazakhstan the case of Karagandy region through aims and indicators of implemented programs and projects in order to understand are applicable for these monotowns and its value.   Methodology. With aim to better understanding the evolution and roots of ineffi ciency of RDP in Kazakhstan on base of Karagandy region monotowns it was adopted a comprehensive review of relevant literature, government programs and it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weakness of government policy in the case of monocities is even highlighted by official reports, which only emphasize improvements in electricity and water supply networks. At the same time, low effectiveness and a lack of impact and value for the end users of these programs and projects-the local community-were demonstrated [79]. Subsequent studies of monocities, which also include the centers we research, even recommend changing the current policy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The weakness of government policy in the case of monocities is even highlighted by official reports, which only emphasize improvements in electricity and water supply networks. At the same time, low effectiveness and a lack of impact and value for the end users of these programs and projects-the local community-were demonstrated [79]. Subsequent studies of monocities, which also include the centers we research, even recommend changing the current policy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%