2020
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/02/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features in cosmic-ray lepton data unveil the properties of nearby cosmic accelerators

Abstract: We present a comprehensive discussion about the origin of the features in the leptonic component of the cosmic-ray spectrum. Working in the framework of a up-to-date CR transport scenario tuned on the most recent AMS-02 and Voyager data, we show that the prominent features recently found in the positron and in the all-electron spectra by several experiments are explained in a scenario in which pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) are the dominant sources of the positron flux, and nearby supernova remnants shape the high… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[10,11], CALET [12] and DAMPE [13] collaborations have also measured a break at 1 TeV in the all-electron spectrum, which could be a signature of a local CR electron source. As first shown in [14] and further discussed in [15], this source should not produce electrons and positrons in similar amounts in order to be compatible with the observed positron fraction: a nearby Supernova Remnant (SNR) would hence fulfill this requirements. Among the known nearby SNRs, Vela and Cygnus Loop appeared as promising candidates due to their age and distance, but recent studies have shown that their expected contribution to the all-electron flux at high-energy ( > 1 TeV) would be sub-dominant (see for example [16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[10,11], CALET [12] and DAMPE [13] collaborations have also measured a break at 1 TeV in the all-electron spectrum, which could be a signature of a local CR electron source. As first shown in [14] and further discussed in [15], this source should not produce electrons and positrons in similar amounts in order to be compatible with the observed positron fraction: a nearby Supernova Remnant (SNR) would hence fulfill this requirements. Among the known nearby SNRs, Vela and Cygnus Loop appeared as promising candidates due to their age and distance, but recent studies have shown that their expected contribution to the all-electron flux at high-energy ( > 1 TeV) would be sub-dominant (see for example [16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For the CR distributions of leptons and nuclei, we adopt the CR densities obtained by solving the CR diffusion-loss equation (including re-acceleration) under the assumption of a homogeneous and isotropic diffusion coefficient by means of the DRAGON code (Evoli et al 2017(Evoli et al , 2018. All the assumptions and parameters of the adopted CR model are discussed in Fornieri et al (2020), where the authors compared their predictions with the most relevant local CR observables (namely: proton, helium, carbon and oxygen flux, boron-to-carbon ratio, low-energy lepton and antiproton fluxes) over a wide energy range (from ≃ 10 MeV up to ≃ 1 TeV).…”
Section: Some Relevant Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-wavelength observations show the presence of five SNRs in the local region (within ∼ 1 kpc) surrounding the Earth 3 , identified with the names Vela Jr, Vela, Cygnus Loop, Simeis-147, IC-443. A bayesian fit of these sources is performed in [4], based on AMS-02 [22] plus H.E.S.S. [3] all-lepton data, showing that, neglecting the rigid contribution of H.E.S.S.…”
Section: Local Electron Accelerators Explain the High-energy Electronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we investigate whether nearby old cosmic accelerators such as supernova remnants (SNRs) and relatively young pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) can explain those experimental results in the framework of a large-scale CR transport setup tuned on the most updated CR nuclei data. For the extended version of the results presented we refer to the principal paper [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%