2006
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2006.879358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Selective Validation (FSV) for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics (CEM). Part I—The FSV Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
119
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sake of brevity only the data associated to the cylindrical inclusions main axes (the z direction) are plotted and compared to the permittivity obtained using the derived equivalent Debye model, for each case. The agreement between the MGA and equivalent Debye is quantified by applying the Feature Selective Validation (FSV) technique [54][55][56][57], as required by the IEEE standard P1597. Furthermore, the difference between the effective MG permittivity and the derived equivalent Debye-like dependences are evaluated through the average error (AE )…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of brevity only the data associated to the cylindrical inclusions main axes (the z direction) are plotted and compared to the permittivity obtained using the derived equivalent Debye model, for each case. The agreement between the MGA and equivalent Debye is quantified by applying the Feature Selective Validation (FSV) technique [54][55][56][57], as required by the IEEE standard P1597. Furthermore, the difference between the effective MG permittivity and the derived equivalent Debye-like dependences are evaluated through the average error (AE )…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, only analytical results are presented for frequency approaching zero. In order to quantify the level of agreement between the comparisons, in accordance with IEEE Standard P1597 [36], the Feature Selective Validation Technique (FSV) [37], [38] Further analysis is presented in the frequency range up to 1250 MHz, although the investigations were performed also outside that band. It was observed that, at higher frequencies, the tested enclosure cannot be treated as an efficient shield.…”
Section: Fig 3 Finite Element Mesh (Comsol)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An EBG-patterned board with decoupling capacitors can be a means of both suppressing noise propagation from extremely low frequencies and minimizing the effects of the discontinuous plane [23]. Figure 12 reports the values of amplitude difference measure (ADM), feature difference measure (FDM) and global difference measure (GDM) evaluated by using the feature selective validation (FSV) technique [24][25][26] according to the recent IEEE Standard P1597.1 [24] for a significant quantification of the comparison between the measured and simulated values in Figure 11 …”
Section: Voltage Drop Resistance and Equidistribution Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%