2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18072013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Selection Method Based on High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images and the Effect of Sensitive Features on Classification Accuracy

Abstract: With the advent of high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery, numerous image features can be utilized. Applying a reasonable feature selection approach is critical to effectively reduce feature redundancy and improve the efficiency and accuracy of classification. This paper proposes a novel feature selection approach, in which ReliefF, genetic algorithm, and support vector machine (RFGASVM) are integrated to extract buildings. We adopt the ReliefF algorithm to preliminary filter high-dimensional features … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increased number of features, such as the image bands, generally improves the accuracy; however, it increases the amount of training samples required [24]. Considering the limited training sample availability in most conditions and the nonlinear response of the LCU classes across several bands, which is known as the "Hughes effect" [25], there is a need for a method to select a subset of relevant features from the original dataset to improve the classification process and achieve a dimension reduction [26].One alternative to overcome the above-mentioned problem is to perform linear transformation methods (such as principal components analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA)), or nonlinear algorithms (such as locality adaptive discriminant analysis (LADA) and multiple marginal fisher analysis (MMFA)), to remove the correlations and higher-order dependences in the image bands and use the produced components as input data for classification, to simplify and improve the process. The linear methods have been widely applied on multispectral data, however, nonlinear methods are generally applied on hyperspectral test data or natural image-based applications, such as face recognition [27][28][29][30].Remote Sens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An increased number of features, such as the image bands, generally improves the accuracy; however, it increases the amount of training samples required [24]. Considering the limited training sample availability in most conditions and the nonlinear response of the LCU classes across several bands, which is known as the "Hughes effect" [25], there is a need for a method to select a subset of relevant features from the original dataset to improve the classification process and achieve a dimension reduction [26].One alternative to overcome the above-mentioned problem is to perform linear transformation methods (such as principal components analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA)), or nonlinear algorithms (such as locality adaptive discriminant analysis (LADA) and multiple marginal fisher analysis (MMFA)), to remove the correlations and higher-order dependences in the image bands and use the produced components as input data for classification, to simplify and improve the process. The linear methods have been widely applied on multispectral data, however, nonlinear methods are generally applied on hyperspectral test data or natural image-based applications, such as face recognition [27][28][29][30].Remote Sens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased number of features, such as the image bands, generally improves the accuracy; however, it increases the amount of training samples required [24]. Considering the limited training sample availability in most conditions and the nonlinear response of the LCU classes across several bands, which is known as the "Hughes effect" [25], there is a need for a method to select a subset of relevant features from the original dataset to improve the classification process and achieve a dimension reduction [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature extraction process, especially image filtering and texture matrix calculation, was markedly affected by the different methods used. These flaws may incur serious bias, leading to unrepeatable studies and invalid conclusions (14)(15)(16)(35)(36)(37). Recently, concerns and possible solutions have been proposed to this challenge (13,23,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-resolution images provide clearer boundary contours, more striking textural information, richer colour hues and more explicit spatial information then the medium-or low-resolution counterparts (Cleve et al 2008). The extraction of building damage information from feature-assisted high-resolution remote sensing images is divided into three categories, namely, pixel-based feature recognition (Blaschke et al 2014;, object-oriented recognition (Zhou et al 2018) and image change detection before and after the disaster (Huang et al 2018). In the absence of pre-disaster remote sensing images, researchers automatically extract collapsed house information from single-phase images after the disaster and extract damage information through models or classifiers (Shafique et al 2011;Xie et al 2016;Adriano et al 2019;Li et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%