2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-01937-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature selection based on term frequency deviation rate for text classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Macro-F1 score is defined as shown in Eq. [10] ( 40 , 41 ). The Macro-F1 score also lies between 0.0 and 1.0, with the smallest value [0] indicating the worst performance of the classifier, and the highest value [1] indicating the best performance of the classifier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Macro-F1 score is defined as shown in Eq. [10] ( 40 , 41 ). The Macro-F1 score also lies between 0.0 and 1.0, with the smallest value [0] indicating the worst performance of the classifier, and the highest value [1] indicating the best performance of the classifier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micro-averaged precision ( miP ) and micro-averaged recall ( miR ) are defined as Note that for both miP and miR , the denominator is the sum of all the elements (diagonal and off-diagonal) of the confusion matrix, and it is 1. Finally, the micro-averaged F 1 score is defined as the harmonic mean of these quantities: This definition is commonly used (e.g., [ 6 , 8 12 , 14 , 15 ]).…”
Section: Averaged F 1 Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This version of macro-averaged F 1 score is less frequently used (e.g., [ 11 , 12 , 16 ]). For our example, In this example, the micro-averaged F 1 score is higher than the macro-averaged F 1 scores because both within-class precision and recall are much lower for the first class compared to the other two.…”
Section: Averaged F 1 Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower the standard deviation indicates, the more near the average. Those features with the same standard deviation as the label are most helpful (H. Zhou, Ma, & Li, 2021).…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%