2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2017.8015432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature selection based on Choquet integral for human activity recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jarraya et al selected 280 features from a total of 561 by means of a nonlinear Choquet integral feature selection approach, classified six basic actions by using the random forest, and finally obtained a better classification effect. However, the large number of selected features affected the performance of the classifier [10]. Doewes et al used the minimum redundancy and maximum correlation feature selection algorithms to analyze the number of selected features and the classification accuracy under different proportions of training sets and test sets, and considered the operation time of the classification process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jarraya et al selected 280 features from a total of 561 by means of a nonlinear Choquet integral feature selection approach, classified six basic actions by using the random forest, and finally obtained a better classification effect. However, the large number of selected features affected the performance of the classifier [10]. Doewes et al used the minimum redundancy and maximum correlation feature selection algorithms to analyze the number of selected features and the classification accuracy under different proportions of training sets and test sets, and considered the operation time of the classification process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a lot of work has been done for basic human activity detection (walking [2][3][4][5], [8], running [10][11][12]18], sitting still [14][15][16]20] etc. [22,23,[26][27][28]); to the best of our knowledge none of these activities mentioned earlier for questionable observer detection have been detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Cheng et al used a dataset where five motion sensors were placed at five different parts of the body [20]. Accelerometers and gyroscopes data were used and processed for human activity recognition in different researches [23,[26][27][28]. All these works have some common problems: the users have to wear gadgets on the body which is highly impractical in real world [4]; some of them are not real time detection [4]; in the cases where the data was collected from smart phones of the users, each users wear their smart phones quite differently (some hold them in one hand, others put them in their pockets, or in their bags etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several of research has been performed on simple human behavior detection (strolling [2][3][4][5][6], running [7][8][9][10], sit idle [11][12][13][14], etc. [15][16][17][18][19]); as far as we know, none of the behaviors listed above has been identified for dubious observer detection. Very little research has been conducted on irregular behavior identification [21] and dubious spectator detection [20,22,23] and the identification of disruptive crowd movements [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%