2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-018-0892-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature selection and prediction of small-for-gestational-age infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So there is a need for early and accurate prediction of preterm infants for appropriate clinical intervention. Li et al [31] have made a comparison of five feature selection methods, namely the chi-square test, information gain, minimum redundancy maximum relevance (MRMR), stepwise logistic regression, and Gini index in RF, to identify the risk factors for SGA infants. They have evaluated their work by applying 4 classifiers (LR, NB, SVM, and RF) while taking precision and AUC as evaluation criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So there is a need for early and accurate prediction of preterm infants for appropriate clinical intervention. Li et al [31] have made a comparison of five feature selection methods, namely the chi-square test, information gain, minimum redundancy maximum relevance (MRMR), stepwise logistic regression, and Gini index in RF, to identify the risk factors for SGA infants. They have evaluated their work by applying 4 classifiers (LR, NB, SVM, and RF) while taking precision and AUC as evaluation criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrelevant and unnecessary features not only affect classifier performance but also demand excessive computational resources and time for the classification task [28][29][30][31]. A variety of feature selection, extraction, and reduction schemes are proposed by various researchers to deal with the curse of irrelevant and dimensionality problem of a classification system [23,28,[32][33][34]. In this article, we recommend using an ensemble of feature selection and extraction schemes to build an accurate and state of the art LGA prediction model.…”
Section: Preparation Of the Principal Feature Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, machine learning (ML) techniques, which could handle complicated relationships and optimize prediction performance from complicated dataset, can overcome these restrictions (16,17). As for predicting the risk of SGA, in a few studies, ML classifiers were used to develop SGA prediction tools in the overall population (18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Unfortunately, the prediction tools did not perform well, with a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.7+.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%