2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30648-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Selection and Machine Learning Applied for Alzheimer’s Disease Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XG-Boost classifier on the ADNI dataset achieved an accuracy of 85.92% [10]. When using CAD-based approaches to detect AD, the genetic package GALGO for feature selection and classifiers such as RF, logistic regression (LR), SVM, and artificial neural networks (ANN) achieved better results compared to state-of-the-art methods with an AUC of 0.842 [11]. A RF-based feature selection model featuring a Gaussian-inspired algorithm achieved a higher classification accuracy of 78.8% over the SVM classifier and a classification accuracy of 75.6% for determining between patients with CN vs. EMCI [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XG-Boost classifier on the ADNI dataset achieved an accuracy of 85.92% [10]. When using CAD-based approaches to detect AD, the genetic package GALGO for feature selection and classifiers such as RF, logistic regression (LR), SVM, and artificial neural networks (ANN) achieved better results compared to state-of-the-art methods with an AUC of 0.842 [11]. A RF-based feature selection model featuring a Gaussian-inspired algorithm achieved a higher classification accuracy of 78.8% over the SVM classifier and a classification accuracy of 75.6% for determining between patients with CN vs. EMCI [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%