2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature-independent context estimation for automatic image annotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm (named PVSVDD), the results were measured by recall and precision. We compared PVSVDD with five other related algorithms, SVM, KSVM-VT[ 13 ], HBF[ 11 ], SIA[ 28 ] and FICE[ 22 ]. We compared the recall and precision of the six algorithms for 63 annotation words.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm (named PVSVDD), the results were measured by recall and precision. We compared PVSVDD with five other related algorithms, SVM, KSVM-VT[ 13 ], HBF[ 11 ], SIA[ 28 ] and FICE[ 22 ]. We compared the recall and precision of the six algorithms for 63 annotation words.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing jaccard similarities, Johnson et al used multiple non-parametric image metadata to identify neighbors of related images followed by a deep neural network to annotate images [ 21 ]. Tariq et al proposed a strategy that performed a tensor analysis of new images to evaluate the context, and then combined the evaluated content and the image content to label images [ 22 ]. In order to solve the problem with incomplete labels for many training image datasets, Wu et al used incomplete label data to train classifiers [ 23 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature this problem has been mainly approached from the tag ranking perspective. In the generative methods, which involve topic models [3,42,60,44] and mixture models [32,25,53,15,6,13], the candidate tags are naturally ranked according to their probabilities conditioned on the test image. For the non-parametric nearest neighbor based methods [37,38,35,27,22,34,61], the tags for the test image are often ranked by the votes from some training images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed similar theme-structure definition in [96] as well, but this theme structure also complements image representations in the proposed model. Themes in training data are determined by the words associated with training images.…”
Section: A Preprocessing Stagementioning
confidence: 99%