2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1626-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature fusion for lung nodule classification

Abstract: In the results, higher overall AUCs and f1-scores were obtained for the non-nodules cases using any of the three features, showing the greatest distinguishability over nodules (benign/malignant). SVM and kNN classifiers were used for benign, malignant and non-nodule classification, where Gabor proved to be the most effective of the features for classification. The cascaded framework showed the greatest distinguishability between benign and malignant nodules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They used the LIDC-IDRI database [19] and achieved accuracy and recall score of 97% and 94.4%, respectively. Farag et al [20] utilized the feature fusion concept for lung nodule classification. They extracted three features by using signed distance transform shape-based feature descriptor, multi-resolution Local Binary Pattern (LBP) and Gabor filter.…”
Section: A Traditional Methods For Nodule Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the LIDC-IDRI database [19] and achieved accuracy and recall score of 97% and 94.4%, respectively. Farag et al [20] utilized the feature fusion concept for lung nodule classification. They extracted three features by using signed distance transform shape-based feature descriptor, multi-resolution Local Binary Pattern (LBP) and Gabor filter.…”
Section: A Traditional Methods For Nodule Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These generic features such as SIFT, SURF, HOG, LBP, and Gabor filters etc. were adopted in References [17,41,43,50,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,94,96,107].…”
Section: Analysis Of Selected Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some selected papers are based on user-defined features, including shape [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60], texture [29,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,41,44,45,46,47,48,50,54,59,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,…”
Section: Main Process Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations