2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature fusion for facial landmark detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments conducted on the Oxford dataset [2] show that the proposed method improves the results of the individual components fused, up to a 10% in the best case. In addition, our method compares favorably with the standard fusion approaches presented in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The experiments conducted on the Oxford dataset [2] show that the proposed method improves the results of the individual components fused, up to a 10% in the best case. In addition, our method compares favorably with the standard fusion approaches presented in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…al [12] evaluates the fusion of 2D and 3D features in the context of facial landmark detection. In a first step, landmarks are learned from an annotated dataset, and later, a template matching approach is applied for recognition.…”
Section: Keypoint Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been many recent achievements in related research sub-areas such as facial landmark localization [3][4] [5][6] [7] [8], tracking and recognition [9] [10]. Realistic facial expression synthesis is useful for affective computing, human computer interaction [11] [12], realistic computer animation [13] and facial surgery planning [14][15], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%