2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature extraction of the first difference of EMG time series for EMG pattern recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three types of features that can be extracted from sEMG signals: time domain features, frequency domain features, and time-frequency domain features [28]. In our study, we concentrated on using features extracted from the time domain, which are widely used in studies and practices due to their low computational complexity compared with frequency domain and time-frequency domain features and performance in low-noise environments [29][30][31][32]. We selected the following 11 time domain features in this study.…”
Section: Semg Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three types of features that can be extracted from sEMG signals: time domain features, frequency domain features, and time-frequency domain features [28]. In our study, we concentrated on using features extracted from the time domain, which are widely used in studies and practices due to their low computational complexity compared with frequency domain and time-frequency domain features and performance in low-noise environments [29][30][31][32]. We selected the following 11 time domain features in this study.…”
Section: Semg Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-seven features of four types (time-domain, frequency-domain, time-and frequency-domain, and nonlinear dynamic features) were calculated. The ten time-domain features included mean absolute value, mean absolute value slope, Willison amplitude, variance (VAR), zero crossing, slope sign change, waveform length (WL), root mean square, autoregressive coefficients (AR), and autoregressive coefficients from the first difference of EMG (FDAR) [6,[13][14][15]. The two frequency-domain features were median frequency and mean power frequency [16][17][18].…”
Section: Feature Set Computation and Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many empirical studies have been conducted that investigate different types of classifiers using various features computed from sEMG signals. For real-time, close-range, and convenient controlling, a variety of classification approaches, such as the support vector machine (SVM), neural networks (NNs), and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), have been applied to estimate the motion intent from the sEMG signals * Correspondence: kanjm@bjfu.edu.cn [4][5][6]. Among the various types of classifiers, however, the SVM is considered to have a better performance than other approaches such as decision trees, neural networks, and model-based reasoning approaches [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phinyomark et al [9] performed feature extraction from 1 st difference of sEMG time series and concluded that the accuracy was higher as compare to features extracted from original signals. Omari et al [10] extracted different features from a four channel-sEMG signal and analyzed them using LDA, quadratic discriminant analysis, and kNN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%