1981
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<0521:feasfp>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Extraction and Selection for Pattern Recognition of Two-Dimensional Hydrometeor Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the development of Optical Array Probes (OAP) for aircraft platforms, large databases on cloud particle shapes were obtained, to which several new classification techniques were applied. Rahman et al [1981]developed a technique for extracting features of two‐dimensional binary images of ice particles and raindrops. From such features derived from OAP images, Hunter et al [1984] developed a classification algorithm that distinguished six categories of ice crystals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the development of Optical Array Probes (OAP) for aircraft platforms, large databases on cloud particle shapes were obtained, to which several new classification techniques were applied. Rahman et al [1981]developed a technique for extracting features of two‐dimensional binary images of ice particles and raindrops. From such features derived from OAP images, Hunter et al [1984] developed a classification algorithm that distinguished six categories of ice crystals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, shapes were classified as round, hexagonal, rectangular (aspect ratios 1, 1.5, and 2), stellar, or unclassifiable. In this procedure, we did not use terminology such as plate, column, or needle, which refer to particle habits (Korolev and Sussman 2000;Moss and Johnson 1994;Rahman et al 1981), because the automated recognition applies strictly only to geometric shapes. While there is no strict correspondence between a given habit and a geometric shape, there are similarities that can be used in application to natural ice crystals (vide infra).…”
Section: Automated Shape Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cunningham (1978) used maximum crystal size and equivalent circle ratio. Rahman et al (1981) compared classification methods based on different features extracted from the images and concluded that the Bayes classifier used with four moment invariants is most efficient. Holroyd (1987) used size, linearity, area, perimeter, and image density to classify images into nine classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since OAPs were developed in the 1970s (Knollenberg, 1970), several attempts have been made to produce highperformance classification algorithms based on morphological descriptors. While mathematically simple, the feature extraction for pattern recognition of 2D hydrometeor images developed by Rahman et al (1981) and Duroure (1982) gives insight on how morphological image analysis is useful to automatically categorize OAP images into different classes. Their approach works well with synthetic images of singular crystals that exhibit completely unambiguous orientations and idealized shapes (see Rahman et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%