2020 IEEE 1st International Conference for Convergence in Engineering (ICCE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icce50343.2020.9290565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Extraction and Classification of Phonocardiograms using Convolutional Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas for the deep learning model, the calculation of the Mel spectrogram and signal quality are already optimised by using inbuilt MATLAB functions, so minimal improvements would be expected for optimising the code. However, YAMNet did require the upsampling of the recordings to 16 For heart sound quality classification, the removal of slow features resulted in only minor changes in results (Table 3). As only a maximum of 15 features was used, only the autocorrelation sample entropy feature was removed, which had a comparable feature selection score to other features in the top 20, meaning the removal of that feature was minor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas for the deep learning model, the calculation of the Mel spectrogram and signal quality are already optimised by using inbuilt MATLAB functions, so minimal improvements would be expected for optimising the code. However, YAMNet did require the upsampling of the recordings to 16 For heart sound quality classification, the removal of slow features resulted in only minor changes in results (Table 3). As only a maximum of 15 features was used, only the autocorrelation sample entropy feature was removed, which had a comparable feature selection score to other features in the top 20, meaning the removal of that feature was minor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, due to less research in lung signal quality analysis, there are fewer hand-crafted features, resulting in inferior results, in comparison to heart signal quality analysis [6]. The development of deep learning models, which take the timefrequency representation of the audio chest sound signal, offers the potential for removing the need for hand-crafted features for the estimation of signal quality [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An obvious limitation of this approach is the need for expert operators to classify each single signal recording. Also in 2020, Chakraborty et al [37] published a work in which they used a convolutional neural network fed with the spectrogram of the PCG signal to evaluate the signal quality. In the same year, a paper by Grooby et al [38] proposed the extraction of as many as 187 features from neonatal PCG signals and classified their quality using an ensemble classifier combining a support vector machine, a decision tree, K-nearest neighbors, and a Gaussian Naïve Bayes classifier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it should be highlighted that more than half of the cited works related to PCG quality assessment [11,12,14,19,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]44] were published in the last 3 years, implying that this topic is gaining importance within the scientific community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most-cited heart sound dataset is the PhysioNet Heart Sound Database released in 2016 which contains over 2400 heart sound recordings from nearly 1300 healthy volunteers and patients [19]. The dataset has stimulated studies on algorithms for automatic segmentation, feature extraction and classification of heart sounds [20][21][22]. All these three tasks can be achieved using machine learning, which is discussed in Section 3.…”
Section: Figure 1 Trends Of Heart Sound Measurement Devices and Resea...mentioning
confidence: 99%