2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature engineering for semantic place prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification results using logistic regression, SVM with different kernels, Gradient Boosted Trees (GBT), and random forests are reported. The authors of [6] have published an extension to paper [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classification results using logistic regression, SVM with different kernels, Gradient Boosted Trees (GBT), and random forests are reported. The authors of [6] have published an extension to paper [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works have been carried out with similar goals to ours [6][7][8][9]21], that is, semantic place prediction, and use data derived from the same database as data set #1 in our work. They differ from our work in the following aspects: the number of features we used for our classification method is only 14 at most, while the other works use more features; we use different classifiers; while the other papers classify all the 10 labels available in data set #1, we prioritize recognizing Home and Work and therefore combine all the less frequent labels to one label Other; and we present a comparison between three different data representation schemes: visits, places, and cumulative samples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In almost all machine-learning tasks, feature engineering and feature selection play an important part [49]. Even if sophisticated estimation algorithms are developed and powerful computing capabilities are available, significant time and energy are spent on looking over the data itself with the goal of identifying additional information, which may be in the Most problems in an M2M domain might be approached at least from two different angles: from the point of view of learning from unlabeled data and from the point of view of active learning.…”
Section: Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the problem of automatic location semantics prediction has been discussed in many literatures [7] [14] [18], previous studies usually applied common classification techniques directly, neglecting the fact that such a problem suffers from serious class imbalance [10] [11], e.g., people go to office much often then they go to cinemas. To address the class imbalance problem, we have tried to tackle the automatic location semantics prediction problem by learning a MultiLevel Classification Model in [7], which divides original classification problem into several sub-problems for classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%