Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has spread to almost all countries of the World and affected people both mentally and economically. The primary motivation of this research is to construct a model that takes reviews or evaluations from several people who are affected with COVID-19. As the number of cases has accelerated day by day, people are becoming panicked and concerned about their health. A good model may be helpful to provide accurate statistics in interpreting the actual records about the pandemic. In the proposed… Show more
“…This study applies four evaluation metrics as the measurement standards of this experiment to evaluate the performance of the artificial neural network model, including accuracy rate, precision rate, recall rate, and F-score [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. True positive ( TP ) means that the predicted sentiment and the actual sentiment are both positive.…”
Section: Experiments Validation and Resultsmentioning
Sentiment analysis is one of the fields of affective computing, which detects and evaluates people’s psychological states and sentiments through text analysis. It is an important application of text mining technology and is widely used to analyze comments. Bullet screen videos have become a popular way for people to interact and communicate while watching online videos. Existing studies have focused on the form, content, and function of bullet screen comments, but few have examined bullet screen comments using natural language processing. Bullet screen comments are short text messages of different lengths and ambiguous emotional information, which makes it extremely challenging in natural language processing. Hence, it is important to understand how we can use the characteristics of bullet screen comments and sentiment analysis to understand the sentiments expressed and trends in bullet screen comments. This study poses the following research question: how can one analyze the sentiments ex-pressed in bullet screen comments accurately and effectively? This study mainly proposes an ERNIE-BiLSTM approach for sentiment analysis on bullet screen comments, which provides effective and innovative thinking for the sentiment analysis of bullet screen comments. The experimental results show that the ERNIE-BiLSTM approach has a higher accuracy rate, precision rate, recall rate, and F1-score than other methods.
“…This study applies four evaluation metrics as the measurement standards of this experiment to evaluate the performance of the artificial neural network model, including accuracy rate, precision rate, recall rate, and F-score [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. True positive ( TP ) means that the predicted sentiment and the actual sentiment are both positive.…”
Section: Experiments Validation and Resultsmentioning
Sentiment analysis is one of the fields of affective computing, which detects and evaluates people’s psychological states and sentiments through text analysis. It is an important application of text mining technology and is widely used to analyze comments. Bullet screen videos have become a popular way for people to interact and communicate while watching online videos. Existing studies have focused on the form, content, and function of bullet screen comments, but few have examined bullet screen comments using natural language processing. Bullet screen comments are short text messages of different lengths and ambiguous emotional information, which makes it extremely challenging in natural language processing. Hence, it is important to understand how we can use the characteristics of bullet screen comments and sentiment analysis to understand the sentiments expressed and trends in bullet screen comments. This study poses the following research question: how can one analyze the sentiments ex-pressed in bullet screen comments accurately and effectively? This study mainly proposes an ERNIE-BiLSTM approach for sentiment analysis on bullet screen comments, which provides effective and innovative thinking for the sentiment analysis of bullet screen comments. The experimental results show that the ERNIE-BiLSTM approach has a higher accuracy rate, precision rate, recall rate, and F1-score than other methods.
“…Another study has indicated that many people have difficulty distinguishing between fake news and real news, irrespective of their gender, age, or educational attainment [ 10 ]. Social media platforms have presented a virtual environment for posting [ 11 ], discussion, exchange of views, and global interaction among users [ 12 ], without restrictions on location, time, or content volume [ 13 ]. A survey conducted in 2017 claimed that 67% of people in the US got their news mainly from social media [ 14 ].…”
Nowadays, social media has become the main source of news around the world. The spread of fake news on social networks has become a serious global issue, damaging many aspects, such as political, economic, and social aspects, and negatively affecting the lives of citizens. Fake news often carries negative sentiments, and the public’s response to it carries the emotions of surprise, fear, and disgust. In this article, we extracted features based on sentiment analysis of news articles and emotion analysis of users’ comments regarding this news. These features were fed, along with the content feature of the news, to the proposed bidirectional long short-term memory model to detect fake news. We used the standard Fakeddit dataset that contains news titles and comments posted regarding them to train and test the proposed model. The suggested model, using extracted features, provided a high detection accuracy of 96.77% of the Area under the ROC Curve measure, which is higher than what other state-of-the-art studies offer. The results prove that the features extracted based on sentiment analysis of news, which represents the publisher’s stance, and emotion analysis of comments, which represent the crowd’s stance, contribute to raising the efficiency of the detection model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.