2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.663651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature based passive acoustic detection of underwater threats

Abstract: Stevens Institute of Technology is performing research aimed at determining the acoustical parameters that are necessary for detecting and classifying underwater threats. This paper specifically addresses the problems of passive acoustic detection of small targets in noisy urban river and harbor environments. We describe experiments to determine the acoustic signatures of these threats and the background acoustic noise. Based on these measurements, we present an algorithm for robustly discriminating threat pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous understanding [8], [9], the abilities to detect underwater threats, continue to be the issues of growing interest with the increasing concerns of detrimental effects on the marine environment. The method of passive acoustic detection for security threats is still a significant topic for further research and development.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous understanding [8], [9], the abilities to detect underwater threats, continue to be the issues of growing interest with the increasing concerns of detrimental effects on the marine environment. The method of passive acoustic detection for security threats is still a significant topic for further research and development.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of a sensor network for threat detection embraces a wide range of problems, including optimal sensor placement [8,23,27], development of detection algorithms and data aggregation techniques [19,23,25,28], threat tracking [1][2][3]14], efficient resource allocation (e.g., sensor battery power [11,20], communication bandwidth [10,24], etc.) and optimal control strategies for networks with mobile and steerable sensors, to mention just a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the performance of each sensor is independent of the others, it is easy to show that the total probability that a diver, crossing at point , be detected by the entire set of sensors is given by (1) The terms, , are calculated using a simple sensor model in which probability of detection is approximated by a linear decrease with range from a maximum value of 95% to reflect the fact that detection is never guaranteed. This model is based on recent work on passive diver detection [6], which suggests that divers can be detected by thresholding a feature value derived from a passive acoustic hydrophone signal. Note that the technique described here can accommodate any detection versus range sensor model.…”
Section: Probability Of Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%