2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feather growth bars as a biomarker of habitat fragmentation in the Eurasian treecreeper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…e ., at the base of the feather vane) using digital Vernier callipers (Powerfix Z11155). Growth bar widths were measured from digital photos taken with a Canon 7D camera in a dark room with shallow angle lighting [41]; we measured the width and position of all visible growth bars from the base of the vane to the feather tip [22] using ImageJ [40]. The width of a growth bar is the distance between the proximal edges of two adjacent dark bands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e ., at the base of the feather vane) using digital Vernier callipers (Powerfix Z11155). Growth bar widths were measured from digital photos taken with a Canon 7D camera in a dark room with shallow angle lighting [41]; we measured the width and position of all visible growth bars from the base of the vane to the feather tip [22] using ImageJ [40]. The width of a growth bar is the distance between the proximal edges of two adjacent dark bands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, fragmentation can cause the disappearance of the specialist component of biodiversity ( Fahrig, 2003 ). Such processes can alter biological, ecological and demographic traits like brood survival and growth ( Suorsa et al, 2003 ; Le Tortorec et al, 2012 ), occupancy or population size ( Schmiegelow, Machtans & Hannon, 1997 ; Villard, Trzcinski & Merriam, 1999 ; Cooper & Walters, 2002 ). Through SDMs, such results can be transposed into geographic projection and inform conservationists and practitioners ( Ferrier et al, 2007 ; Maiorano et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since larger feathers have been linked to a higher growth rate both within (de la Hera, le Tortorec et al, 2012;Pérez-Tris et al, 2002) and between species (de la Hera et al, 2012), we expected to find positive correlations between feather length and growth bar width both within and between the four storm-petrel species. Since the studied species adopt contrasting moult-breeding strategies, we expected to find differences in feather growth rate relative to feather length between the two strategies, indicating differences in relative energy allocation towards moult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, within species, growth bar width has also been related to other feather traits [i.e. positively to feather size (de la Hera, le Tortorec et al, 2012;Pérez-Tris, Carbonell & Tellería, 2002), though not in all species (de la Hera, Pérez-Tris et al, 2002), and negatively to feather quality (Marzal et al, 2013)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%