2020
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2020.2983318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasible Region: An Actuation-Aware Extension of the Support Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Links’ length and mass distribution, joint strengths and range of motions, ground contact modeling, and stance-specific constraints are specified and the subject’s dynamics can then be described using common robotic modeling approaches for floating-base robotic systems with multiple degrees-of-freedom (DOF) ( Figure 4A ). The dynamics and stability of systems in multi-contact stances is usually more challenging to describe ( Del Prete et al, 2018 ; Orsolino et al, 2020 ), given the indeterminacy in the system’s foot reactions when the legs form a closed loop with the ground ( Mummolo et al, 2015a ). Different modeling choices (e.g., number of DOF, single vs. double stance, planar vs. three-dimensional) lead to different BoB and balanced regions.…”
Section: Simultaneous Balance Assessment and Training Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Links’ length and mass distribution, joint strengths and range of motions, ground contact modeling, and stance-specific constraints are specified and the subject’s dynamics can then be described using common robotic modeling approaches for floating-base robotic systems with multiple degrees-of-freedom (DOF) ( Figure 4A ). The dynamics and stability of systems in multi-contact stances is usually more challenging to describe ( Del Prete et al, 2018 ; Orsolino et al, 2020 ), given the indeterminacy in the system’s foot reactions when the legs form a closed loop with the ground ( Mummolo et al, 2015a ). Different modeling choices (e.g., number of DOF, single vs. double stance, planar vs. three-dimensional) lead to different BoB and balanced regions.…”
Section: Simultaneous Balance Assessment and Training Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centroidal dynamics does not account for kinematic or actuator torque limits. To partly remedy these limitations, extensions of the contact wrench cone to include torque limits have been proposed [55] or learning-based approaches have been introduced to represent more complex whole-body constraints into the centroidal model itself [56].…”
Section: Centroidal Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the authors' knowledge, related works on impact or task-space model-predictive control did not consider the robot's structural hardware limits defined in joint-space, which implicitly represent bounds in the contact-space. A first step in this direction has been proposed in [26] for a reduced model, and later in [27], [28] for a non-redundant three degrees of freedom robot leg without considering impacts. Yet, none of these related works is explicitly aware of (or tries to optimize) the maximum possible impact velocity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%