2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(03)00313-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasible predictive criteria for reproductive performance of white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei: egg quality and female physiological condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
33
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
13
33
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results regarding the number of hatched juveniles coincide with those previously reported in penaeid shrimps (Arcos et al 2003(Arcos et al , 2005, and in the marine crab Maja brachydactyla (Andr es et al 2010), but differ from results obtained by Islam & Yahya (2016) in the mud crab S. paramamosain. This result, along with female mortality recorded throughout the experiment, may reflect the physiological exhaustion in females of N. davidi as a consequence of multiple spawning, considering the high energetic costs associated with reproduction in species with direct development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Results regarding the number of hatched juveniles coincide with those previously reported in penaeid shrimps (Arcos et al 2003(Arcos et al , 2005, and in the marine crab Maja brachydactyla (Andr es et al 2010), but differ from results obtained by Islam & Yahya (2016) in the mud crab S. paramamosain. This result, along with female mortality recorded throughout the experiment, may reflect the physiological exhaustion in females of N. davidi as a consequence of multiple spawning, considering the high energetic costs associated with reproduction in species with direct development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…One such phenomenon, a short latency period-often as little as three days-from unilateral eyestalk ablation to complete ovarian development and first spawn has been reported to be significantly shorter in the better spawners (Arcos et al, 2003b;Arcos et al, 2004;Bray and Lawrence, 1992;Palacios et al, 1999a). Our findings of 4.1± 3.4 days for the best-performing females vs. 6.0±4.4 Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…This enigmatic phenomenon and the fact that individual female performance is extremely variable has been noted in a number of studies (Table 2; Arcos et al, 2004;Arcos et al, 2003b;Arcos et al, 2003a;Bray and Lawrence, 1998;Bray et al, 1990;Hoang et al, 2003;Holtschmit and Romero, 1991;Palacios and Racotta, 2003;Palacios et al, 1999b;Palacios et al, 1999a;Racotta et al, 2003;Wyban and Sweeney, 1991). Table 2 shows that the average fraction of non-active females exceeds 30% and that, on average, less than 20% of the females contributed more than 60% of the reproductive output of the whole broodstock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, only one other similar study of egg size variation in marine invertebrates has reported egg sizes that do not vary with brood order. In that study, the average egg size for 54 white shrimp was shown not to vary (1-way ANOVA) over 4 broods after ovoposition was artificially induced by eyestalk ablation (Arcos et al 2003). However, only 15% of the animals produced 4 broods, and those that did were shown to have had larger eggs in the first brood than those that produced fewer broods, making interpretation of the data unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%