2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2966194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasible Generalized Least Squares Using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross-sectional dependence was performed to understand the interaction between cross-sectional units (De Hoyos & Sarafidis, 2006), with the Wooldridge test used to test for autocorrelation in panel data. To test the hypothesis, a Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) was used as it is a preferred estimator compared to Ordinal Least Square for data with heteroscedasticity (Miller & Startz, 2018). In addition, an independent t-test was used to determine if there were differences in the financial performance of the banks before (2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009) and after (2010-2014) the introduction of integrated reporting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cross-sectional dependence was performed to understand the interaction between cross-sectional units (De Hoyos & Sarafidis, 2006), with the Wooldridge test used to test for autocorrelation in panel data. To test the hypothesis, a Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) was used as it is a preferred estimator compared to Ordinal Least Square for data with heteroscedasticity (Miller & Startz, 2018). In addition, an independent t-test was used to determine if there were differences in the financial performance of the banks before (2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009) and after (2010-2014) the introduction of integrated reporting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heteroscedastic errors such as those found in Q-Ratio and ROE rendered the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) estimators inefficient, as it is likely to induce bias in the standard errors. To overcome this challenge, a different form of estimator is selected, with the common form being Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) if the form of heteroscedasticity is estimated (Miller & Startz, 2018). As such, Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) estimator is the preferred model.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it does not agree with the findings of Kader and Leong (2008), that there is bi-directional causality between IBs and CBs. As mentioned, that GLS is proposed to be used by this research because of the heteroskedastic case and the serial correlation (Baltagi & Wu, 1999;Miller & Startz, 2018). As shown in Table 5 that the null hypothesis of homoscedasticity is rejected, meaning that the heteroscedasticity is present in the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As mentioned, that GLS is proposed to be used by this research because of the presence of heteroskedastic case and the serial correlation in the data (Baltagi & Wu, 1999;Miller & Startz, 2018). As shown in Tables 7 and 9, the CBs and IBs heteroskedasticity tests, respectively are presented.…”
Section: Gls Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this paper used the GLS to test the relationships; such estimation is considered a more powerful test and its results more efficient than ordinary least squares (OLS). As well as to solve problems of serial correlation and heteroskedasticity (Baltagi & Wu, 1999;Hansen, 2007;Miller & Startz, 2018).…”
Section: Generalized Least Squares (Gls)mentioning
confidence: 99%