2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility, toxicity and response of upfront metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy therapy followed by German Pediatric Oncology Group Neuroblastoma 2004 protocol in newly diagnosed stage 4 neuroblastoma patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, 131 I‐MIBG therapy has been used for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory disease . Recent studies have suggested that 131 I‐MIBG has a positive impact on outcomes when it is given at the time of diagnosis in conjunction with induction chemotherapy or with HDCT/ASCT . However, the optimal time to administer 131 I‐MIBG therapy has not been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Historically, 131 I‐MIBG therapy has been used for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory disease . Recent studies have suggested that 131 I‐MIBG has a positive impact on outcomes when it is given at the time of diagnosis in conjunction with induction chemotherapy or with HDCT/ASCT . However, the optimal time to administer 131 I‐MIBG therapy has not been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Recent studies have suggested that 131 I-MIBG has a positive impact on outcomes when it is given at the time of diagnosis in conjunction with induction chemotherapy or with HDCT/ASCT. [25][26][27] CKD, n (%) 4 (67) 2 (22) .136…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was administered as a fixed dose: first course 131 I-MIBG dose was 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) and second course 5.5 GBq (150 mCi; ref. 14).…”
Section: Translational Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As 131 I-MIBG-therapy-related hematologic side effects have been reported, we questioned if 131 I-MIBG, when given upfront, would affect hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (e.g., CD34 þ cells) and/or the BM microenvironment, hence impairing the ability to harvest mobilized CD34 þ cells. In a pilot study, that mainly focused on upfront 131 I-MIBG-therapy toxicity and efficacy, we observed a CD34 þ cell harvest failure in only 2 of 21 patients (14). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of stem cell apheresis after upfront 131 I-MIBG-therapy in a larger cohort of patients with HR-NBL, and determine the effect on hematologic reconstitution after ASCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up-front MIBG therapy appears to be safe and tolerable, again with myelosuppression being the major toxicity (89)(90)(91) (91). The causes of the relatively modest response to MIBG therapy are likely to be multifactorial (92) and have motivated consideration of strategies such as highdose or multiple-dose MIBG therapy to enhance response in refractory patients. Limitations related to radiation safety precautions and tolerability restrict the dose of MIBG that can be administered as a single dose.…”
Section: Net Targeting For Therapy 123 I/ 131 I-mibg Theranostics Formentioning
confidence: 99%