2019
DOI: 10.13066/kspm.2019.14.1.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility Test of Smartphone Application for Activity Daily Living by Chronic Stroke Patients

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the validity of a smartphone application for post-stroke daily living activity management based on an evaluation by users and experts. METHODS: The study design adhered to the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation ADDIE (Analysis-Design-Development-Implement-Evaluation) model. We downloaded the application onto the smartphones of 33 users and 30 experts, taught them how to use it, and asked them to use the application for four weeks. The users' daily lives before… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to measure the usability evaluation of the mobile application developed and used in this study, the usability evaluation tool that measured mobile application use for daily activity living education was appropriately modified and utilized [30]. This evaluation tool consists of a total of 9 question items for the evaluation of mobile contents, a total of 11 question items for the evaluation content of the interface design, and 2 question items for the content of the technical evaluation.…”
Section: Research Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to measure the usability evaluation of the mobile application developed and used in this study, the usability evaluation tool that measured mobile application use for daily activity living education was appropriately modified and utilized [30]. This evaluation tool consists of a total of 9 question items for the evaluation of mobile contents, a total of 11 question items for the evaluation content of the interface design, and 2 question items for the content of the technical evaluation.…”
Section: Research Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%