2020
DOI: 10.4135/9781529735604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility Study of Determining Prevalence of Common Mental Health Disorders in Male Immigration Detainees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biggest concern is that the response rate was low and we do not know how agreeing to participate or not differed between ex‐prisoners and others, or whether those with mental health difficulties were more or less likely to participate. Strategies considering how to increase response rate for such populations, learning from this study, have been reported elsewhere (Howells & Sen, 2020). The resulting relatively small sample size meant that some of the statistical analyses were likely under‐powered to detect associations between ex‐prisoner status and screened prevalence rate of mental disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biggest concern is that the response rate was low and we do not know how agreeing to participate or not differed between ex‐prisoners and others, or whether those with mental health difficulties were more or less likely to participate. Strategies considering how to increase response rate for such populations, learning from this study, have been reported elsewhere (Howells & Sen, 2020). The resulting relatively small sample size meant that some of the statistical analyses were likely under‐powered to detect associations between ex‐prisoner status and screened prevalence rate of mental disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligibility criteria for participation were: being born outside the European Union, being over the age of 18 and having a working knowledge of the English language. Figure 1 shows more details and the sampling is further described elsewhere (Howells & Sen, 2020; Sen et al., 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%