Feasibility, psychological outcomes and practical use of a stress-preventive leadership intervention in the workplace hospital: the results of a mixed-method phase-II study

Abstract

ObjectivesHospitals are psychologically demanding workplaces with a need for context-specific stress-preventive leadership interventions. A stress-preventive interprofessional leadership intervention for middle management has been developed. This phase-II study investigates its feasibility and outcomes, including work-related stress, well-being and transformational leadership.DesignThis is a mixed-methods study with three measure points (T0: baseline, T1: after the last training session, T2: 3-month follow-up). Additionally, focus groups were conducted to assess participants’ change in everyday work.SettingA tertiary hospital in Germany.ParticipantsN=93 leaders of different professions.InterventionAn interactive group setting intervention divided in five separate sessions ((1) self-care as a leader, (2) leadership attitudes and behaviour, (3) motives, needs and stressors of employees, (4) strengthen the resource ‘team’, (5) reflection and focus groups). The intervention was conducted between June 2018 and March 2020 in k=5 runs of the intervention.Outcome measuresFeasibility and acceptance were measured with a self-developed intervention specific questionnaire. Psychological outcomes were assessed with the following scales: work-related strain with the Irritation Scale, well-being with the WHO-5 Well-being Index and transformational leadership with the Questionnaire of Integrative Leadership.ResultsAfter the intervention at T2, over 90% of participants reported that they would recommend the intervention to another coworker (92.1%, n=59) and all participants (n=64) were satisfied with the intervention and rated the intervention as practical relevant for their everyday work. Participants’ self-rated cognitive irritation was reduced, whereas their well-being and transformational leadership behaviour were improved over time. Focus group discussions revealed that participants implemented intervention contents successfully in their everyday work.ConclusionsThis intervention was feasible and showed first promising intraindividual changes in psychological outcomes. Participants confirmed its practical relevance. As a next step, the intervention will be evaluated as part of a multicentre—randomised controlled trial within the project SEEGEN (SEElische GEsundheit am Arbeitsplatz KrankeNhaus).

An innovative Australian doctors’ health service: using systems therapy to work with individual medical leaders in an acute public health setting

“…Although most aligned with health-orientated leadership interventions [10][11][12] outcomes were not always geared to health and well-being of the leader or staff. Nor were goals primarily geared to effect change in the organisation (an indirect effect).…”

“…Yet, studies of health-orientated leadership interventions in health care are sparse. 11,13 A systematic review yielding only seven studies showing mixed, but weak evidence for effect on mental health of leaders and/or staff. 13 Two studies showed significant positive trends for leaders' mental health.…”

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a Strengths-Based Nursing and Healthcare Leadership program aimed at building leadership capacity: A concurrent mixed-methods study

“…Few interventions targeting the leadership competencies of nurse leaders have been found to assess and report on the impact the interventions have on leaders' stress levels and overall psychological functioning. A recent German study of 93 middle management leaders from a tertiary hospital, which evaluated the impact of a stress-preventive leadership intervention, reported improvements in well-being ( Stuber et al, 2022 ). An intervention study focusing on servant leadership offered to 42 senior nursing managers in one acute general hospital in Hong Kong ( Luk, 2018 ) suggested improvements in work-related well-being and work satisfaction.…”

What is well-being? A scoping review of the conceptual and operational definitions of occupational well-being

“…[117]; 93 leaders of different professions from a tertiary hospital in Germany. [118]; Arabic version of WHO-5 was used with 200 patients from six rural PHC settings in the Ismailia, Egypt governorate. [119]; 1,164 employees nested in 30 workplaces in Canada.…”