2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-01955-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility, planning and control of ground-wall transition for a suctorial hexapod robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results have shown that the centrally symmetrical configuration has the advantages of flexible motion and high stability (Li et al, 2016). However, Gao et al (2021) has shown that the centrosymmetric structure of a hexapod adsorption robot is not suitable for arc‐space structures. In 2018, Tongji University designed a six‐legged negative‐pressure adsorption robot suitable for climbing on vertical glass curtain surfaces (Wang, 2018; Xu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results have shown that the centrally symmetrical configuration has the advantages of flexible motion and high stability (Li et al, 2016). However, Gao et al (2021) has shown that the centrosymmetric structure of a hexapod adsorption robot is not suitable for arc‐space structures. In 2018, Tongji University designed a six‐legged negative‐pressure adsorption robot suitable for climbing on vertical glass curtain surfaces (Wang, 2018; Xu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, the South China University of Technology proposed a gait that crossed intersecting transition surfaces; it was initially validated using robot simulation software (Cai et al, 2021). In 2021, the South China University of Technology further developed a six‐legged negative‐pressure adsorption robot with four degrees of freedom (DoF) on one leg and proposed an “SS‐type interpolation function” gait planning algorithm that could span shaped intersecting surfaces (Gao et al, 2021). The above‐mentioned multilegged negative‐pressure adsorption robots and their gaits are unable to adapt to arc surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These potential application scenarios pose technical challenges for robot attachment devices. Industrial adhesion methods include negative pressure [13,14], aerodynamic force [15], and magnetic adhesion [16] used in robotics, particularly in the field of climbing robots from 1960s. On the contrary, these attachment devices based on traditional artificial adhesion technology have some drawbacks, as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increasingly complex designs of wall-climbing robots entail new requirements for terrain-environment adaptability. For complex wall climbing, wall-climbing robots relying on foot motion [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] generally have higher degrees of freedom and have higher adaptability to the environment than wheeled and crawler wall-climbing robots. Guan et al [18] proposed a wall-climbing robot with bipedal motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its unique inchworm motion enables it to move on discontinuous discrete surfaces with high flexibility. The Hexapod wall-climbing robot designed by Gao et al [14] can span different walls. Bionic wall-climbing robots using peristaltic, inchworm, crawling, and other motion modes [1,[20][21][22][23][24][25] can also move on complex walls by adapting to rough, uneven, and irregular contact surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%