2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11131535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of Using Grammars to Infer Room Semantics

Abstract: Current indoor mapping approaches can detect accurate geometric information but are incapable of detecting the room type or dismiss this issue. This work investigates the feasibility of inferring the room type by using grammars based on geometric maps. Specifically, we take the research buildings at universities as examples and create a constrained attribute grammar to represent the spatial distribution characteristics of different room types as well as the topological relations among them. Based on the gramma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, procedural modeling is used by several researchers for façade modeling and indoor modeling, but in most cases they produce synthetic models for virtual cities and gaming applications (Aliaga, Demir, Benes, & Wand, 2016; Mathias, Martinović, Weissenberg, & Van Gool, 2011; Müller, Wonka, Haegler, Ulmer, & Van Gool, 2006). There are some recent examples for indoor modeling and using grammar which result in more complex models from point clouds (Dehbi, Hadiji, Gröger, Kersting, & Plümer, 2017; Tran, Khoshelham, Kealy, & Díaz‐Vilariño, 2019b; Tran & Khoshelham, 2020) or inferring the semantics of rooms (Hu et al, 2019), but none of these methods offer a complementary solution to check the correctness of the final model. Figure 1 illustrates the evolution of grammar applications from the early stage to this time.…”
Section: Scientific Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, procedural modeling is used by several researchers for façade modeling and indoor modeling, but in most cases they produce synthetic models for virtual cities and gaming applications (Aliaga, Demir, Benes, & Wand, 2016; Mathias, Martinović, Weissenberg, & Van Gool, 2011; Müller, Wonka, Haegler, Ulmer, & Van Gool, 2006). There are some recent examples for indoor modeling and using grammar which result in more complex models from point clouds (Dehbi, Hadiji, Gröger, Kersting, & Plümer, 2017; Tran, Khoshelham, Kealy, & Díaz‐Vilariño, 2019b; Tran & Khoshelham, 2020) or inferring the semantics of rooms (Hu et al, 2019), but none of these methods offer a complementary solution to check the correctness of the final model. Figure 1 illustrates the evolution of grammar applications from the early stage to this time.…”
Section: Scientific Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al. (2019) proposed inferring the room usage of university research buildings by using grammars and Bayesian inference based on geometric maps. The approach was evaluated based on 15 maps with 408 rooms and a promising tagging accuracy of 0.84 was achieved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most indoor venues do not have check‐in information. Hu et al (2019) proposed inferring the room usage of research buildings at universities by using grammars and Bayesian inference based on geometric maps. However, the grammar rules defined can only cover partial research buildings, and cannot be applied in other styles of research buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of this study is inspired by the fact that there exists strong association between the spatial (particular building) elements in the real world as the buildings are man-made structures that are constructed with plans made by people. That is, given partial spatial elements, the other element can be inferred based on the association relationship (Hu, Fan, and Noskov 2018;Hu et al 2019Hu et al , 2020. Intuitively, the entrance is associated with two kinds of spatial elements: (1) The location of the main entrance of a public building is correlated with the shape of its footprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%