2017
DOI: 10.1111/jre.12522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of the salivary transcriptome as a novel biomarker in determining disease susceptibility

Abstract: This study showed that minimal amounts of human RNA were able to be isolated from the saliva of patients with periodontitis as well as controls. Further work is required to enhance the extraction process of human mRNA from saliva if the salivary transcriptome is to be used in determining individual patient susceptibility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limitation might have been caused by the total amount of mRNA detected from the whole saliva being less than that detected from the tissue samples, due to the nature of saliva and limitations of the present analytical technology ( Figure 5 ). The present results are in agreement with those of a previous study showing only small amounts of total RNA, with wide variations and contamination from bacterial sources, in microarray analyses of samples taken from patients with chronic periodontitis [ 29 ]. Salivary mRNA is stabilized by interactions with salivary proteins and apoptotic bodies [ 30 ], and RNases and proteases from microbial/human sources can rapidly degrade mRNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This limitation might have been caused by the total amount of mRNA detected from the whole saliva being less than that detected from the tissue samples, due to the nature of saliva and limitations of the present analytical technology ( Figure 5 ). The present results are in agreement with those of a previous study showing only small amounts of total RNA, with wide variations and contamination from bacterial sources, in microarray analyses of samples taken from patients with chronic periodontitis [ 29 ]. Salivary mRNA is stabilized by interactions with salivary proteins and apoptotic bodies [ 30 ], and RNases and proteases from microbial/human sources can rapidly degrade mRNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, RNA present considerable stabilization challenges due to its susceptibility to spontaneous phosphodiester bond cleavage and because of degradation by several microbial and human degrading agents, such as ribonucleases (RNases), that are present in saliva. 122,123 The overall stability of salivary RNA depends upon different factors, including RNA purity and origin, collection method, preconditioning steps, and storage. 124 A possible protocol for reliable sampling and detection of salivary DNA and RNA includes the collection of saliva on ice, on-site centrifugation at 4 °C to collect saliva supernatant, addition to the supernatant of a mix of inhibitors targeting enzymatic activities, and storage at −80 °C for long-term sample preservation.…”
Section: Methods For Sampling and Collecting Salivamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On another front, salivary RNA can be used for disease diagnosis and to evaluate the presence of potential microbial and viral infections, although human RNA is less stable than the viral and microbial counterparts due to the activity of endonucleases. , In addition, using salivary RNA over DNA is advantageous since it makes it possible to detect not only the presence of a gene but also the level of its expression (Figure b). However, RNA present considerable stabilization challenges due to its susceptibility to spontaneous phosphodiester bond cleavage and because of degradation by several microbial and human degrading agents, such as ribonucleases (RNases), that are present in saliva. , …”
Section: Stabilization Approaches For Salivary Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a disadvantage for studying disease states, which are affected more by gene expression and the biochemical outputs of the microbiome than the taxonomic identity of the microorganisms. This has already been demonstrated in several gut and oral microbiome studies [30,31] The lack of comprehensive taxonomic classifications and the inability to investigate gene expression has limited the utility of the conventional methodologies (16S and metagenomics) in investigating the role of the saliva microbiome and human transcriptome in health and disease [32]. This is particularly apparent in the context of microbial functions, which have been shown to be more informative in disease states than taxonomy alone [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%