Feasibility of Testing Client Preferences for Accessing Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment (iOAT): A Pilot Study

Dobischok, Sophia; Metcalfe, Rebecca K.; Matzinger, Elizabeth; Lock, Kurt; Harrison, Scott; Macdonald, Scott; Amara, Sherif; Schechter, Martin T.; Bansback, Nick; Oviedo‐Joekes, Eugenia

doi:10.2147/ppa.s391532

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The in-person visits give opportunities for safety monitoring, therapeutic relationship building, and access to wraparound services (e.g., social workers, counselling, other medical care) (36). These bene ts are important for many clients, yet the demands of iOAT render it an extremely highthreshold treatment option (37,38).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“I can’t see anything but upside”: A qualitative study of clients’ experiences on North America’s first take-home injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) program

Oviedo‐Joekes

Dobischok

Carvajal

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To support public health measures during the Covid-19 pandemic, oral opioid agonist treatment (OAT) take-home doses were expanded in Western countries with positive results. Injectable OAT (iOAT) take-home doses, which were previously not recommended, were made available for the first time in several sites to align with public health measures. Building upon these temporary risk-mitigating guidelines, a clinic in Vancouver, BC continued to offer two of a possible three daily doses of take-home injectable medications to eligible clients. The present study explores the processes through which take-home iOAT doses improved clients’ quality of life and continuity of care in real-life settings. Methods Three rounds of semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted over a period of seventeen months beginning in July 2021 with eleven participants receiving iOAT take-home doses at a community clinic in Vancouver, BC. Interviews followed a topic guide that evolved iteratively in response to emerging lines of inquiry. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then coded using NVivo 1.6. Results Participants reported that take-home doses granted them the freedom away from the clinic to have daily routines, form plans, and enjoy unstructured time. Participants appreciated the greater privacy, accessibility, and ability to engage in paid work. Furthermore, participants enjoyed greater autonomy to manage their medication and level of engagement with the clinic. These factors contributed to greater quality of life and continuity of care. Participants shared that their dose was too essential to divert and that they felt safe transporting and administering their medication off-site. In the future, participants would like to access longer take-home prescriptions, the ability to pick-up at different and convenient community pharmacies, and a medication delivery service. Conclusions Reducing the number of daily onsite injections from two or three to only one revealed the diversity of rich and nuanced needs that added flexibility and accessibility in iOAT can meet. Urgent action such as policy reform and licencing diverse opioid medications/formulations is necessary to make these measures permanent and meet the varied needs and preferences of OUD clients.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%