Abstract:Background: Little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of using mobile technology among seriously ill older adults experiencing moderate to severe pain. Objective: A smartphone application was tested for feasibility and acceptability of use among ethnically-diverse older adults experiencing moderate to severe pain. Additionally, authors aimed to document patient perceived barriers and facilitators of using the mobile device for pain monitoring. Methods: Twenty-three participants were enrolled in a… Show more
“…Although most participants reported an attempt to self-manage their pain and symptoms, lack of knowledge about how to do so was a major barrier. Similar to other populations (Valenti et al, 2016), we found that patients with mTBI did want to use an app to help them with managing their pain and symptoms. Among our participants, returning to school after injury and completing homework assignments was a major challenge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…For example, ranking items by importance, as seen in the PainTracker computerized questionnaire, might be beneficial for those with TBI who have multiple issues to address when they meet with their healthcare providers. Suggestions from Valenti et al (2016) study about increasing font size and working around scrolling capacity might make the application more usable for those with sensory issues, as well as older adults. The 2-way messaging capabilities explored by Jamison and et al (2017) might be able to increase use of the application in some participants.…”
Section: Current Informatics Tools To Support Pain Self-managementmentioning
Background: Those with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) often experience pain and symptoms long after their initial injury. A gap in current knowledge is how persons would prefer to monitor and manage these symptoms following mTBI. Aims: The purpose of this study was to explore self-management strategies to inform design of an informatics tool to support self-management of pain and symptoms following mTBI. Design: A qualitative descriptive approach using semi-structured interviews of participants was used. Settings: Participants were interviewed by phone.
“…Although most participants reported an attempt to self-manage their pain and symptoms, lack of knowledge about how to do so was a major barrier. Similar to other populations (Valenti et al, 2016), we found that patients with mTBI did want to use an app to help them with managing their pain and symptoms. Among our participants, returning to school after injury and completing homework assignments was a major challenge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…For example, ranking items by importance, as seen in the PainTracker computerized questionnaire, might be beneficial for those with TBI who have multiple issues to address when they meet with their healthcare providers. Suggestions from Valenti et al (2016) study about increasing font size and working around scrolling capacity might make the application more usable for those with sensory issues, as well as older adults. The 2-way messaging capabilities explored by Jamison and et al (2017) might be able to increase use of the application in some participants.…”
Section: Current Informatics Tools To Support Pain Self-managementmentioning
Background: Those with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) often experience pain and symptoms long after their initial injury. A gap in current knowledge is how persons would prefer to monitor and manage these symptoms following mTBI. Aims: The purpose of this study was to explore self-management strategies to inform design of an informatics tool to support self-management of pain and symptoms following mTBI. Design: A qualitative descriptive approach using semi-structured interviews of participants was used. Settings: Participants were interviewed by phone.
Introduction:
Population aging and related issues are among the most important challenges
in different countries. It seems that the use of remote technology can provide the elderly
with better healthcare services and can help them to manage chronic diseases. This research aimed
to investigate the experts' views about the feasibility of using mobile-based technology to manage
chronic diseases in the elderly.
Methods:
This was a survey study which was completed in 2018. The participants were the faculty
members of the department of geriatrics across the country (n=33). In order to collect data, two
questionnaires were used. The first questionnaire contained questions related to the five dimensions
of a feasibility study and the second questionnaire consisted of five open questions
about the opportunities, threats, strengths and weaknesses of using mobile-based technology in
chronic disease management. The qualitative data were analyzed by using content analysis
method and the quantitative data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics.
Results:
From the participants’ perspectives, it was feasible to use mobile-based technology in
chronic disease management for elderly people. The mean values for five feasibility dimensions
were as follows: ethico-legal dimension (4.09±1.01), scheduling dimension (3.70±1.03), economic
dimension (3.47±1.04), operational dimension (3.42±1.12) and technical dimension (3.07±1.27).
While such a technology can help increasing the accessibility of healthcare services, raising health
literacy, and saving time and costs, the main threats, namely; the misinterpretation of information
and the possibility of breeching confidentiality should not be underestimated.
Conclusion:
The results showed that mHealth and remote medical technologies can be used for
chronic disease management among elderly people. However, these technologies have some strengths
and weaknesses. In order to succeed in the development and implementation of these projects, it is essential
to consider probable threats and weaknesses before implementing the applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.