2018
DOI: 10.31487/j.rdi.2018.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of sagittal T2 mapping of the median nerve in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sagittal T2 mapping of the median nerve for localization of abnormal regions. Material and Methods: Nine hands of seven patients with CTS and five hands of five healthy volunteers were evaluated using sagittal T2 mapping and axial spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) images. Three regions of interest (ROIs) at the carpal tunnel (ROI-1 to ROI-3) and one control ROI distal to the carpal tunnel (ROIC) were de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While T2 mapping using MESE has been readily applied in muscle ( 7 , 9 ), it is limited in nerve imaging because (i) as a 2D acquisition, MESE typically has poor slice-resolution (3–6 mm) and may not be readily reformatted in different planes for nerve evaluation, and (ii) MESE has poor scan efficiency, requiring multiple echoes (8–16) and often long scan times (>8 min) for acquiring high in-plane resolution (0.3 mm) ( 10 ). Nevertheless, promising findings of correlation between nerve MESE T2 and electrodiagnostic results have been observed ( 4 , 11 ), which motivate improving the spatial resolution of T2 mapping in peripheral nerve assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While T2 mapping using MESE has been readily applied in muscle ( 7 , 9 ), it is limited in nerve imaging because (i) as a 2D acquisition, MESE typically has poor slice-resolution (3–6 mm) and may not be readily reformatted in different planes for nerve evaluation, and (ii) MESE has poor scan efficiency, requiring multiple echoes (8–16) and often long scan times (>8 min) for acquiring high in-plane resolution (0.3 mm) ( 10 ). Nevertheless, promising findings of correlation between nerve MESE T2 and electrodiagnostic results have been observed ( 4 , 11 ), which motivate improving the spatial resolution of T2 mapping in peripheral nerve assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%