Feasibility of Nurse-Managed Tobacco Use Interventions in Outpatient Surgical Practice

Jose, Thulasee; McNamara, Manda; Barrone, Megan L.; Johnson, Walter L.; Larsen, Heather A.; Martin, E.; Marienau, Mary Shirk; Judd, Marlea A.; Warner, David O.

doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2019.10.009

Cited by 7 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 3 presents an overview of each study 36‐98 . A summary of the characteristics of the 56 studies is presented in Table 4.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 6 presents an overview of the groups, listing the implementation strategy for each group and subsequently providing a breakdown of each implementation outcome (acceptability, adoption, appropr iateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability). 31,36,37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]56,58,[60][61][62][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]73,75,76,82,[86][87][88][89]91,92,[94][95][96] A more comprehensive list of implementation outcomes for all included studies is presented in Supporting Table 2. A summary of results is presented below:…”

Section: Implementation Outcomes By Implementation Groupmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Across these studies, evidence for appropriateness, feasibility, and fidelity was lacking. Only one study 43,62,70,75,89,91,94 ) consisted of education programs with reinforcement and internal leadership, with an average study period of 1.2 years. Most studies (6 of 7) had planning strategies (eg, stakeholder consultation 43 or internal endorsement 91 ), and most had monitoring strategies (eg, feedback 89 ).…”

Section: Implementation Outcomes By Implementation Groupmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…e For example, systems may include cue cards, tent cards, posters, and electronic record system changes. Adoption (4) Adoption was modest (Jose 2020, 62 Kisuule 2010, 70 Matten 2011 75 ); eg, an increase in asking about smoking from 51% to 80% (Jose 2020 62 ) or an increase in documentation of tobacco-dependence counselling in progress notes from 36% to 44%; and nicotine-replacement therapy dosing increased from 26% to 64% (Kisuule 2020 70 ). One study noted a substantial improvement in the number of nicotine-replacement therapy units used, from 768 in the year before implementation to 1418 12 mo later (Vega & Stolare 2010 94 ).…”

Section: Activity No Of Studies (%)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three studies showed that the intervention was still integrated after 12 mo (Bickerstaffe 2013, 43 Jose 2020, 62 Slattery 2016 91 ). One article indicated that penetration reduced over time (from 76% to 52%), potentially because of a financial incentive already being provided to radiation oncology residents (Saxony 2017 89 ).…”

Section: Penetration (4)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

How can hospitals change practice to better implement smoking cessation interventions? A systematic review

Ugalde

White

Rankin

et al. 2021

CA A Cancer J Clinicians

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Smoking cessation reduces the risk of death, improves recovery, and reduces the risk of hospital readmission. Evidence and policy support hospital admission as an ideal time to deliver smoking‐cessation interventions. However, this is not well implemented in practice. In this systematic review, the authors summarize the literature on smoking‐cessation implementation strategies and evaluate their success to guide the implementation of best‐practice smoking interventions into hospital settings. The CINAHL Complete, Embase, MEDLINE Complete, and PsycInfo databases were searched using terms associated with the following topics: smoking cessation, hospitals, and implementation. In total, 14,287 original records were identified and screened, resulting in 63 eligible articles from 56 studies. Data were extracted on the study characteristics, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes were guided by Proctor and colleagues' framework and included acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. The findings demonstrate that studies predominantly focused on the training of staff to achieve implementation. Brief implementation approaches using a small number of implementation strategies were less successful and poorly sustained compared with well resourced and multicomponent approaches. Although brief implementation approaches may be viewed as advantageous because they are less resource‐intensive, their capacity to change practice in a sustained way lacks evidence. Attempts to change clinician behavior or introduce new models of care are challenging in a short time frame, and implementation efforts should be designed for long‐term success. There is a need to embrace strategic, well planned implementation approaches to embed smoking‐cessation interventions into hospitals and to reap and sustain the benefits for people who smoke.

show abstract

“…Table 3 presents an overview of each study 36‐98 . A summary of the characteristics of the 56 studies is presented in Table 4.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%