2014
DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2014.958197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of MRI-based reference images for image-guided radiotherapy of the pelvis with either cone-beam computed tomography or planar localization images

Abstract: This study demonstrated that it is feasible to conduct IGRT of the pelvis with MRI-based reference images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…figure 3) to be adequate for assessing rectal and bladder filling. Quantitative IGRT results were also reported by Korhonen et al in a separate study (Korhonen et al 2015). The SDs of differences in manual registrations with planar KV and MV localization images using bony match were ≤1.0 mm and ≤1.7 mm respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…figure 3) to be adequate for assessing rectal and bladder filling. Quantitative IGRT results were also reported by Korhonen et al in a separate study (Korhonen et al 2015). The SDs of differences in manual registrations with planar KV and MV localization images using bony match were ≤1.0 mm and ≤1.7 mm respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…6,7,[11][12][13] The sCTs can also be used as reference images for image-guided RT. 14 Thus, the entire RTP workflow can be conducted with MRI only. 15 At certain clinics, the prostate MRI only workflow has been used for standard clinical practice since 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We envisage that an efficient MRI-alone treatment workflow for prostate cancer (Refs. [14][15][16][17] will involve seven main stages: 1. MRI scan acquisition (in treatment position); 2. automatically contoured organs; 3. automatically contoured gold seed locations; 4. sCT generation from MRI; 5. manual quality assurance of automatic contours; 6. dose planning conducted from the sCT; and 7. patient setup and treatment at a linear accelerator (using sCT-based DRRs with seed positions for position verification).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%