2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of measuring pericoronary fat from precontrast scans: Effect of iodinated contrast on pericoronary fat attenuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing the impact of factors extraneous to disease pathophysiology on PCAT attenuation has formed the basis of a number of recent studies, which have explicated the role played by the use of contrast on PCAT attenuation. Almeida et al [ 95 ] studied patients with CAD who underwent pre- and post-contrast scans, which were used as points of comparison for attenuation and volume differences owed to the impact of contrast enhancement. Pre-contrast scans had significantly lower PCAT attenuation of approximately 3–4 HU, as well as lower PCAT volume, compared to post-contrast scans.…”
Section: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (Cta) Assessment Of Eat and Pericoronary Adipose Tissue (Pcat) As A Marker Of Coronary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the impact of factors extraneous to disease pathophysiology on PCAT attenuation has formed the basis of a number of recent studies, which have explicated the role played by the use of contrast on PCAT attenuation. Almeida et al [ 95 ] studied patients with CAD who underwent pre- and post-contrast scans, which were used as points of comparison for attenuation and volume differences owed to the impact of contrast enhancement. Pre-contrast scans had significantly lower PCAT attenuation of approximately 3–4 HU, as well as lower PCAT volume, compared to post-contrast scans.…”
Section: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (Cta) Assessment Of Eat and Pericoronary Adipose Tissue (Pcat) As A Marker Of Coronary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, ours is the first study to report such PCAT attenuation measurement and its clinical results. The absolute value of fat attenuation in Hounsfield units might potentially differ between an ideal ECG-triggered and contrast computed tomography angiogram and a non-contrast, non-ECG triggered HRCT as available in the current study, although a good correlation of between PCAT measurement is now documented between precontrast and postcontrast scans (22). However, since all patients underwent the same modality of HRCT scans, the relative comparison between alive and dead patients in our study should be unbiased by this limitation, even more considering there was no difference in the number of patients with an increased heart rate (>100 beats per minute, table 1) which in theory could lead to partial volume effect of coronary artery lumen and its surroundings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Given the high spatial resolution of CT and that adipose tissue has distinct attenuation values, EFV is readily identified allowing for accurate volumetric measurement [6]. Fat attenuation and volume can also be reliably measured from pre-contrast calcium scans, with volume quantification showing particularly strong correlation [26]. It is one of the more reliable and reproducible methods for estimating the extent of epicardial fat volume with high spatial resolution [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%