2016
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1191084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of liver stiffness measurement in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery using XL probe

Abstract: LSM with XL probe is feasible in almost two-thirds of morbidly obese patients with a BMI ≥50 kg/m(2). Reliable prediction of advanced fibrosis appears to be possible even if formal criteria of successful measurements are not met.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous NAFLD studies, LSM cut‐off values for advanced fibrosis using the M probe ranged from 8‐12 kPa, with 84%‐100% sensitivity and 83%‐97% specificity . Relatively few published data are available using the XL probe, in particular the appropriate cut‐off values for fibrosis and whether severe obesity and steatosis influence the reliability and accuracy of these measurements . Importantly, we found that, among 41 patients with LSM ≥8.2 kPa (40 required the XL probe), 85.4% had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis on histology or imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous NAFLD studies, LSM cut‐off values for advanced fibrosis using the M probe ranged from 8‐12 kPa, with 84%‐100% sensitivity and 83%‐97% specificity . Relatively few published data are available using the XL probe, in particular the appropriate cut‐off values for fibrosis and whether severe obesity and steatosis influence the reliability and accuracy of these measurements . Importantly, we found that, among 41 patients with LSM ≥8.2 kPa (40 required the XL probe), 85.4% had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis on histology or imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…(32) Relatively few published data are available using the XL probe, in particular the appropriate cut-off values for fibrosis and whether severe obesity and steatosis influence the reliability and accuracy of these measurements. (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38) Importantly, we found that, among 41 patients with LSM ≥8.2 kPa (40 required the XL probe), 85.4% had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis on histology or imaging. In contrast, only 2 of 18 patients with LSM <8.2 kPa who underwent liver biopsy had Brunt fibrosis stage F3 and none had cirrhosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The second major finding in our study was that TE measurements correlated strongly with fibrosis when using the M probe but were unreliable when using the XL probe. Based on existing literature, we believe that BMI differences between groups are likely to explain this observation, where reduced penetration of TE shear waves into the intrahepatic tissue reduces performance of the test [21]. Indeed, a prospective study of more than 10,000 patients indicated that liver stiffness measurements are unreliable in nearly one in five cases, often due to obesity [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For similar reasons, 1 set of cutoff values was chosen according to the recommendations for the XL probe, which was used in the vast majority of patients. We have previously shown for obese patients that reliable prediction of advanced fibrosis appears to be possible even if formal criteria of successful measurements are not completely met [17].…”
Section: Te and Capmentioning
confidence: 99%