2011
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2011.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of large-scale screening using N-ERC/mesothelin levels in the blood for the early diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma

Abstract: Abstract. a large-scale screening involving the measurement of n-Erc/mesothelin levels in blood using an EliSa system for the early diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma (mm) was carried out in individuals with a history of employment at construction sites. approximately 30,000 subjects were screened. Of the 80 subjects with high-risk values, one male patient was diagnosed as having mm based on a pEt study and histopathology. This is the first report of the pre-clinical diagnosis of mm based on blood test screen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported (12), we initially defined the participants as high-risk if they exhibited abnormal levels (>8.0 ng/ml) of N-ERC/mesothelin. However, it was considered that this criterion was not sufficient for a screening and that more optimal criteria were required.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported (12), we initially defined the participants as high-risk if they exhibited abnormal levels (>8.0 ng/ml) of N-ERC/mesothelin. However, it was considered that this criterion was not sufficient for a screening and that more optimal criteria were required.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that mesothelin plays a role in tumor adhesion and metastasis based on evidence that it can bind to MUC16 (also known as CA 125), which is highly glycosylated, to mediate heterotypic cell adhesion (Imashimizu et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPM diagnosis was performed in 1 of 80 subjects with a marker value higher than a predefined cut-off [39]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%