2020
DOI: 10.2337/dc20-1503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Early Experience

Abstract: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems have been explored in a few studies for non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients (1-3). During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) became a concern. On 1 April 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced it would not object to the use of CGM systems to assist with COVID-19 patient monitoring (4). This study was conducted to explore the feasibility of using CGM in noncritically ill patients hospital… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…28-30 While there are no guidelines for a threshold MARD that is considered acceptable in critically ill patients, one recent letter published about Dexcom G6 use in noncritically ill COVID-19 inpatients reported a MARD of 9.77% using capillary blood glucose as the reference. 31 In the complicated, critically ill patient with COVID-19, a higher MARD would be expected than in outpatient studies or inpatient studies in noncritically ill patients. Given this context, the accuracy of the results we found was above our expectations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28-30 While there are no guidelines for a threshold MARD that is considered acceptable in critically ill patients, one recent letter published about Dexcom G6 use in noncritically ill COVID-19 inpatients reported a MARD of 9.77% using capillary blood glucose as the reference. 31 In the complicated, critically ill patient with COVID-19, a higher MARD would be expected than in outpatient studies or inpatient studies in noncritically ill patients. Given this context, the accuracy of the results we found was above our expectations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 Several case reports/series have been published, demonstrating the initial feasibility of remote glucose monitoring and insulin adjustment based on monitoring with a CGM. [55][56][57] In addition, CSII/AID systems could also be utilized in selected patient populations in both the ICU and floor settings to potentially improve glycemic outcomes and reduce work burden. 51,58 However, implementation of any of these technologies requires an approach that is collaborative/teambased and allows for close follow-up and adaptation if needed over time.…”
Section: Summary Of Panelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite limited experience, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is not objecting to the inpatient use of CGM to limit the exposure of health care workers to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and to reduce the waste of personal protective equipment (1). Recent efforts in non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients suggest that CGM devices are accurate in the inpatient setting and can help monitor patients remotely (2,3). In addition, two recent small trials enrolling non-ICU patients confirm the feasibility of using remote real-time CGM in the hospital (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%