Feasibility of an Electronic Health Tool to Promote Physical Activity in Primary Care: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background Physical inactivity is associated with increased health risks. Primary care providers (PCPs) are well positioned to support increased physical activity (PA) levels through screening and provision of PA prescriptions. However, PCP counseling on PA is not common. Objective This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing an electronic health (eHealth) tool to support PA counseling by PCPs and estimate intervention effectiveness on patients’ PA levels. Methods A pragmatic pilot study was conducted using a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design. The study was conducted at a single primary care clinic, with 4 pre-existing PCP teams. Adult patients who had a periodic health review (PHR) scheduled during the study period were invited to participate. The eHealth tool involved an electronic survey sent to participants before their PHR via an email or a tablet; data were used to automatically produce tailored resources and a PA prescription in the electronic medical record of participants in the intervention arm. Participants assigned to the control arm received usual care from their PCP. Feasibility was assessed by the proportion of completed surveys and patient-reported acceptability and fidelity measures. The primary effectiveness outcome was patient-reported PA at 4 months post-PHR, measured as metabolic equivalent of task (MET) minutes per week. Secondary outcomes assessed determinants of PA, including self-efficacy and intention to change based on the Health Action Process Approach behavior change theory. Results A total of 1028 patients receiving care from 34 PCPs were invited to participate and 530 (51.55%) consented (intervention [n=296] and control [n=234]). Of the participants who completed a process evaluation, almost half (88/178, 49.4%) stated they received a PA prescription, with only 42 receiving the full intervention including tailored resources from their PCP. A cluster-level linear regression analysis yielded a non–statistically significant positive difference in MET-minutes reported per week at follow-up between intervention and control conditions (mean difference 1027; 95% CI −155 to 2209; P=.09). No statistically significant differences were observed for secondary outcomes. Conclusions Our results suggest that it is feasible to build an eHealth tool that screens and provides tailored resources for PA in a primary care setting but suboptimal intervention fidelity suggests greater work must be done to address PCP barriers to resource distribution. Participant responses to the primary effectiveness outcome (MET-minutes) were highly variable, reflecting a need for more robust measures of PA in future trials to address limitations in patient-reported data. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03181295; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03181295

The Feasibility of a Web-Based Educational Lifestyle Program for People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Our baseline survey completion rate was 37%, while previous online studies have described higher rates with ranges of 39.3–80.5% ( 18 , 19 , 44 – 46 ); these studies contained fewer outcome measures and were therefore likely shorter and completed more quickly. Interestingly, 35 participants in this study commenced the baseline survey but did not complete it.…”

“…To our knowledge, there is no gold-standard for baseline survey length, and requirements may vary on a case-by-case basis, as suggested by the large standard deviation in survey completion time described here. Considering our study and others described here ( 18 , 19 , 44 – 46 ), a baseline survey with three to four outcomes measures should not constitute a barrier to participation. Completion of the baseline survey was hypothesized to act as “buy-in” and encourage participants to complete the course; however, four participants did not complete any of the modules despite completing the baseline survey.…”

Learning from ‘lived expertise’: engaging athletes and patients in sport and exercise medicine research and policy

“…Our research on physical activity prescription taught us that when patients are involved in the design, implementation in the healthcare setting improves. 5 Instead of counselling using generic physical activity guidelines, patients want physicians to provide individualised recommendations focused on proximal health goals which address environmental and social contexts. Patients also want physicians to recommend tools that incorporate planning, goal setting and goal monitoring features.…”

Building Primary Health Care Personnel’s Support for a Patient Portal While Alleviating eHealth-Related Stress: Survey Study

“…Local champions persuade their peers and patients of the “professional appropriateness” of the new services [ 7 ]. While HCP’s endorsement of patient portals is critical for the adoption and continued use by the patients [ 4 , 10 , 11 ], studies [ 12 , 13 ], even in controlled pilot settings [ 14 ], have identified the failure to engage frontline employees in the promotion of digital tools.…”